As long as the tank can bring its protected firepower, and with the development of powerful and reliable automotive systems, mobility and agility as well as its phsycological shock to the battlefield, then there will be a place for it.
Since the first use of tanks, and development of anti-tank weapons, certain groups have been crying that the end is nigh, usually for financial savings) yet they are still here.
Perhaps armour should move into the third dimension by the development of better armoured (stealth) and armed helicopters.
modern tanks are better than ww1 tanks in every way there faster have better armour better weapons one of the main differences is that modern tanks have a rotating turret
European nations built up their armies by propaganda, war bonds, switching civilian factories to firearm, tanks, and war material factories.
tanks helped to break the stalemate that trench warfare created. They were also good at attacking trenches because bullets just bounced off the armour
tanks, and gases
Tanks were just used as back ups. Not like todays tanks that are used in the front to push through the lines. Tanks had many flaws still since they were just introduced by Britain in the war.
The armies' tanks were huge.
The armies marched down in straight rows, toward the army tanks.
The Elephant!
we keep them in a place called the motor pool
Yes. Generally referred to as artillery, most armies use a type of cannon known as a howitzer. Aircraft and tanks also use cannon.
modern tanks are better than ww1 tanks in every way there faster have better armour better weapons one of the main differences is that modern tanks have a rotating turret
As Landships. Armies had never utilized hatches, turrets, or internal cannons; consequently, armies had to turn to the Navy for technology. The first cannons (guns) installed in tanks were Naval guns. The nomenclature for tanks were adapted from Naval terms: hatches, turrets, sponson boxes, back decks, bow machine guns, and the hull, etc. The first tanks were designed by Naval architects.
Besides the US, the armies of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Australia.
That is an untrue assumption. Tanks dominated the battlefield in Russia, and North Africa as well.
In India, armies used war elephants as tanks due to their size, strength, and ability to intimidate enemies in battle. In Cambodia, the armies used war elephants as well as water buffalo, camels, and even rhinoceroses in some instances for their strength and ability to carry heavy loads or weaponry into battle.
Iraq & Afghanistan have armor (tanks) in their armies; but the US/Coalition is not at war those countries. The enemy consists of criminals (terrorists)...no government, no army, no flag, and no tanks (unless they hi-jack them).
European nations built up their armies by propaganda, war bonds, switching civilian factories to firearm, tanks, and war material factories.