Yes, if a son is given all the same names that his father has, and his father is not already a 2nd or 3rd, then the son may be called 2nd, or Junior.
If the father is James Allen Garfield, and the son is named James Allen Garfield, then the son can be called either James Allen Garfield II, or James Allen Garfield, Jr.
If the father is James Allen Garfield III, then the son is James Allen Garfield IV. If James Allen Garfield I and James Allen Garfield II are no longer living, then James Allen Garfield III could call himself James Allen Garfield, Sr., and his son James Allen Garfield, Jr.
If the son's name is exactly the same as his father's (first, middle and last) then he may be called "Junior", or he could use "the Second" if he prefers. There is no requirement that he use either suffix.
no, the wedding was called off at the last second
During the war: 1. French was the second language of Vietnam (Saigon was the called the Paris of the Orient). 2. Catholics were the second religion of Vietnam.
because lots of cultures and lifestyles were shared
No, a father's name is typically not considered a last name; rather, it is usually a first name or given name. A last name, or surname, is inherited and shared among family members, while a father's name refers to the individual male parent. In many cultures, children may carry the father's last name, but the father's name itself is distinct from that surname.
If the son's name is exactly the same as his father's (first, middle and last) then he may be called "Junior", or he could use "the Second" if he prefers. There is no requirement that he use either suffix.
left first middle second and no right second an middle last
In the Middle East, the people did not have last names per say at the time. They were called 'Name' bar 'Father's name'. Paul's/Saul's father's name is not known, but we do know that his father was Pharisee. So Paul would have been known as Saul bar (father's name) or Paul bar (father's name)
you could make him the third if you wanted to, but I think the 2nd is probably the most accurate. then again I thought it was a father son thing not skip generation.
No. In order to be called a junior, the son must have the same name as his father, exactly the same name with no variation. Adding a middle name for a child of a father with no middle name removes the possibility of naming that child as a 'junior'.John Wesley Jones cannot be John Wesley Jones, Jr. if his father is named simply John Jones.
If your asking for his middle name, its Jerry.
You put all the numbers in order(smallest to largest) then cross off the first the last then the second then the second to last and so on the middle number is the median.
its called procrastination.
he called out elies name
AnswerHe should be named II. You should only use Jr. where the child has the same name as his father. AnswerIf you name your son after your father, your father was the first of that name in your family, and no one else in the family has that name now (a cousin named for your father, for example), then you can call your son "the second" (or II). You can also style your son as "Junior" if you link, as long as your father is still living. (If there is a cousin named for your father and using both the same first name and surname, then your son might be "the third." ) Note that neither the II nor "Junior" is part of your son's name. Both are ways of saying, "the younger" as a way of distinguishing him from your father and others with the same name in your family.Ultimately, it is up to you and your father, and evetually your son, how to style him since there are no hard and fast rules, and certainly no laws or regulations on the subject.
Their debut album was called Chasing Lights, and their second was called Wordshaker. I think their third (last) album is called Headlines.
The father of Chris Whitten, the creator of WikiAnswers, is Ted Whittenkraus. (Ted changed his last name when he married his second wife.)