The Civil Wars arose from a struggle amongst the nobles for power.
Sulla took over as dictator for two years to put a system in place. After he left office, it went back to power contests.
Caesar learnt from this and proclaimed himself dictator for life to keep control of the power factions. They solved this problem by ending his life.
Octavian learnt from this and ruled from the background as First Citizen and shared power with the Senate. It worked for 200 years, until emperors took over and the Asian tries moved in.
rome
It was due to lack of jobs. Many jobs were done by slaves. Moreover, Rome was more of a city of consumption.
Due to a few factors, lack of control. The government couldn't control the 500k strong military. Lack of money, lots of citizens were rioting. Lack of political stability, Rome's political system was inefficient and also they couldn't keep control of their empire overall.
The plebeians' feelings toward the new government in ancient Rome varied. Initially, they were often dissatisfied due to a lack of representation and power compared to the patricians. However, over time, reforms such as the establishment of the Tribune of the Plebs allowed them to have a voice in governance, leading to increased support for the government among plebeians. Ultimately, their approval depended on how well the government addressed their needs and grievances.
The Old Kingdom ended in chaos. Nothing certain is known about what happened, but it seems that the country declined gradually, perhaps due to bad government, or, more likely, due to a series of bad harvests, which resulted in widespread and recurrent famine.
Possible theories stemming from no law and government are massive disorder and chaos globally due to lack of a centralized governing principle.
rome
rome
Chaos due to a lack of government typically arises when there is a breakdown of social order and law enforcement, leading to rampant disorder and instability. Without a governing authority to enforce rules and regulations, individuals may resort to violence, theft, and other criminal behaviors, resulting in a power vacuum. This can cause communities to fragment, as people turn to local groups or militias for protection, further exacerbating conflict and insecurity. Ultimately, the absence of effective governance can lead to widespread suffering and hinder societal progress.
It was due to lack of jobs. Many jobs were done by slaves. Moreover, Rome was more of a city of consumption.
Due to a few factors, lack of control. The government couldn't control the 500k strong military. Lack of money, lots of citizens were rioting. Lack of political stability, Rome's political system was inefficient and also they couldn't keep control of their empire overall.
The United States government has never shut down due to lack of money, although it has been severely delayed and crippled.
The one benefit of a dictatorship government is swift decision making due to lack of consultations.
The north.
The plebeians' feelings toward the new government in ancient Rome varied. Initially, they were often dissatisfied due to a lack of representation and power compared to the patricians. However, over time, reforms such as the establishment of the Tribune of the Plebs allowed them to have a voice in governance, leading to increased support for the government among plebeians. Ultimately, their approval depended on how well the government addressed their needs and grievances.
budget cuts are cuts or shortages of money made by the government due to the lack of tax payers
due to the lack of money and corrupted government officials, it can hardly develop itself.