Yes, because in millitary rule there is no freedom of speech.
Civil rule is better than military rule for several reasons. Firstly, civil rule is based on democratic principles, allowing for the participation of citizens in decision-making processes through elections and representation. This promotes inclusivity and diversity of perspectives, leading to more balanced and fair governance. Additionally, civil rule is generally associated with greater respect for human rights and freedoms, as military rule often involves restrictions on civil liberties in the name of maintaining order and security. Overall, civil rule provides a more stable and sustainable form of government that is accountable to the people it serves.
Nigeria has witnessed transitions from democratic rule to military rule by force. Military force was justified in that the leaders sought to "maintain control" when democracy created a chaotic and dysfunctional society. Howver, it has always been disputed that military leaders have outstayed their welcome and utilized government resources even AFTER "stabilizing" the nation. Nigeria is overrun by corruption due largely in part to it's patron-client system, or clientalism, which refers to government positions in support for certain leaders. Military rule has largely played into that and had often times used violent forces to supress outbreaks and rebellions, or simply expressions of free speech that did not go over too well with the current government. A key military leader to know is Obasango, who later gave up his military status in order to allow a peaceful transition from military rule to democracy, the first ever in Nigerian history. Hope that helps!! Sonya
Nigeria was under British rule from 1914 until 1960
One during reconstruction.
military rule
civilian rule is better than military rule because there is freedom and peace in the nation better than when the military was ruling us
1984
mag aral ka kc hnd puro dota
Because it was under strict military rule.
It has already been stopped. It has been gone since 1985.
The military rules by force and not by the will of the people. Military rule is seldom for the good of the people. Civil rights, in fact basic human rights are often none existent under military rule.The military are AUTHORITARIAN in nature.The civilians gives room for public opinion which is lacking in military
Democracy has been raging in Nigeria since 1999. This occurred when the military rule ended in the country that same year.
Civil rule is better than military rule for several reasons. Firstly, civil rule is based on democratic principles, allowing for the participation of citizens in decision-making processes through elections and representation. This promotes inclusivity and diversity of perspectives, leading to more balanced and fair governance. Additionally, civil rule is generally associated with greater respect for human rights and freedoms, as military rule often involves restrictions on civil liberties in the name of maintaining order and security. Overall, civil rule provides a more stable and sustainable form of government that is accountable to the people it serves.
Nigeria has witnessed transitions from democratic rule to military rule by force. Military force was justified in that the leaders sought to "maintain control" when democracy created a chaotic and dysfunctional society. Howver, it has always been disputed that military leaders have outstayed their welcome and utilized government resources even AFTER "stabilizing" the nation. Nigeria is overrun by corruption due largely in part to it's patron-client system, or clientalism, which refers to government positions in support for certain leaders. Military rule has largely played into that and had often times used violent forces to supress outbreaks and rebellions, or simply expressions of free speech that did not go over too well with the current government. A key military leader to know is Obasango, who later gave up his military status in order to allow a peaceful transition from military rule to democracy, the first ever in Nigerian history. Hope that helps!! Sonya
air space through which aeroplanes are bound by Civil or Military rule, to fly
The military government in Nigeria, which lasted several decades, had profound effects on the country. It led to significant political instability, human rights abuses, and suppression of democratic freedoms. Economic mismanagement and corruption flourished under military rule, contributing to widespread poverty and social unrest. Additionally, the military's dominance hindered the development of democratic institutions and governance, creating a legacy of challenges for Nigeria's political landscape.
Nigeria was under British rule from 1914 until 1960