The justanian empower is selfish and did not let women have rights
They are similar because they all establish a behavior code or legal standard for the society.
One way in which the Code of Hammurabi, the Twelve Tables, and the Justinian Code are similar is that each represents an early attempt to codify laws and establish a legal framework for society. These legal codes aimed to provide clarity, consistency, and predictability in governance by outlining specific laws and penalties. Additionally, they reflect the values and social norms of their respective cultures, serving as a foundation for future legal systems.
It was the Body of Civil Law (Corpus Juirs Civilis) commissioned in Justinian I. Two editions were published, one in 529 and the other in 534. In the Renaissance it started being called Justinian code. It got lost in the west and it was rediscovered in a library in Pisa in 1070. Four professors at the University of Bologna systematised its study. This made law faculty of Bologna University (the first university in Europe) very popular. It attracted students from all over Europe. The study of Roman civil law then spread to universities all over Europe.
There was no such thing as the twelve tables of Justinian. The Law of the Twelve Tables was Rome's first law code which was issued in 450 and 449 BC. Justinian I ruled from 527 to 565 AD, 976 to 1076 years after the Law of the Twelve Tables.Justinian I commissioned a collection of books called Corpus Juris Civilis (Body of Civil Law), which was also dubbed Justinian Code in the 16th century. A first edition was published in 529 and a second one in 534. It was a very comprehensive digest of centuries of Roman civil law. It also included collections of essays by famous Roman jurists in two student textbooks. It has provided the basis of the civil law of many modern countries.The Corpus Juris Civilis came in four parts:1) The Codex (book) Justinianus, which was a review of imperial laws going back 400 years (to the time of Hadrian). It scrapped obsolete or unnecessary laws, made changes when necessary and clarified obscure passages. Its aim was to put the laws in a single book (previously they were written on many different scrolls), harmonise conflicting views among jurists which arose from centuries of poorly organised development of Roman law and have a uniform and coherent body of law. It consists of 12 books, 1 book covers ecclesiastical law, the duties of high officers and sources of law, 7 cover private law, 1 criminal law and 3 administrative laws.2) The Digesta is a collection of fragments taken from essays on laws written by jurists (mostly from the 2nd and 3rd centuries) which express the private opinions of legal experts. Most were from Ulpian (40%) and Paulus (17%). It was a large amount of writing which was condensed in 50 books. It was used as an advanced law student textbook.3) The Institutiones is a textbook for first year law students written by two professors. It was a series of extracts from statements on the basic institutions of Roman law from the teaching books by 'writers of authority.' In was largely based on the texts of Gaius, a jurist of the 2nd century AD.4) The Novellae Constitutiones, which contained laws recently issued by Justinian.
This one is wrong! --> Because Justinian was a tyrant who persecuted his enemies.
They were a written codification of law.
They are similar because they all establish a behavior code or legal standard for the society.
Dividing them into tables will make it more organized and better or simpler to understand when you need to compare or interpret something.
Well one of them was the twelve tables making the rich and the poor equal to lawing.
It was the Body of Civil Law (Corpus Juirs Civilis) commissioned in Justinian I. Two editions were published, one in 529 and the other in 534. In the Renaissance it started being called Justinian code. It got lost in the west and it was rediscovered in a library in Pisa in 1070. Four professors at the University of Bologna systematised its study. This made law faculty of Bologna University (the first university in Europe) very popular. It attracted students from all over Europe. The study of Roman civil law then spread to universities all over Europe.
The Twelve Tables (XII Tabulae), or Law of the Twelve Tables (Lex XII Tabularum), is the earliest known law code of Rome. It is lost except as reconstructed from references by later Roman writers. For them it was obsolete, being written in an earlier form of the language (conventionally called Old Latin), and thus at times unintelligible. Festus (late 2c, epitomizing Verrius Flaccus, the tutor of Augustus's grandsons) notes several archaic usages in Roman writers which were based on the wording of the Twelve Tables. As for its ongoing legal relevance, Gellius (c130-c180, ap 1:10) says that the whole obsolete system of the Twelve Tables had been "put to rest" by the Aebutian Law of c0150. Cicero (0106-043) tells us that in his youth students used to memorize the Twelve Tables "as a ditty," but that this was no longer the case in his later years. The Tables would thus seem to have been known in late Republican times, though with less relevance for legal proceedings after 0150, and dropping out of the rhetoricians' curriculum about 050, during the early Empire. The suggestion that the Tables were originally a codification of rules derived from previous practice fits the known contents sufficiently well.Legend. The date and circumstances of the Twelve Tables (see the separate History page) are uncertain. The tradition that they were compiled by a Commission of Ten (decemviri) is taken for granted by Cicero, but may be legendary, as may the supposed date of that Commission, which is usually given as 0451, with a second and supplementary meeting in c0450, at which it is said that two more tables were added to the original ten. Some historians have suggested much later dates for the Tables, such as c0300 (Pais) or c0200 (Lambert). It is also claimed that their composition was preceded by a visit to Athens for the purpose of examining the Solonic law; this might be a mythic exaggeration of a more modest and more gradual contact with the Greek cities in Italy. The Twelve Tables are alleged to be favorable toward the aspirations of the commoners, an opinion which is also found in the law foundation myths of other cultures (in China, we have the Tsau Gwei story and the Lw Sying text, both from the 04th century but claiming to represent a situation of centuries earlier, and both representing the operation of law as favorable to the common people. But the Twelve Tables as we have them do not support this idea; one provision in fact forbids marriage between nobles and commoners. The cosmological number of "ten" compilers may be mythical as well; compare the symbolic number of "seventy" translators for the Suptuagint (sometimes given as seventy-two, both versions implying "for all the nations").Nor is the middle of the 05th century itself historically clear. Nearly all Roman laws ascribed to that period are in one way or another suspect. Traditions about the Twelve Tables thus look more like cultural piety than cultural memory. It will be best to get our initial impression of the Tables from an examination of the content and implied aetiology of the Tables themselves.Reality. There were, however, in some sense Twelve Tables, perhaps more likely twelve chapters in a code than twelve plates of bronze (though fragments of bronze plates with later laws written on them have been found archaeologically). The provisions of the Twelve Tables were known to legally knowledgeable or generally erudite persons in later times. Only a few references by those persons mention the number of the Table on which a given law was written, or give the position of that law on that table. Modern reconstructions are thus in large part arbitrary or extrapolative, and their arrangement of material cannot be relied on. The same applies to the reconstruction given here. With a few changes, we follow the order of Warmington (1938, rev 1967), who in turn follows Dirksen (1824). Warmington's numbering gives 111 laws in 12 tables, plus a further 10 unplaced laws, for a total of 121. 121 is not an intrisically unrealistic number: it is within the range found in several other early West Asian law codes. The order of topics, including the late placement of laws involving the sacred, also has parallels elsewhere.Character. The content of the Tables, and the tone of later references to them, both suggest a codification of previous case law, formulated as advice to future judges (the typical verb is hortatory: "let it be"), and given further authority by proclamation. That authority was never formally revoked in later centuries, though law as such continued to evolve. This would somewhat parallel the Hammurabi Code, which (as we see it) is an empirical case law collection given authority by framing statements and by public display on a stone monument. The contents of the Tables may fruitfully be compared with this and other Mesopotamian codes, as well as with the Greek code preserved at Gortyn.
There was no such thing as the twelve tables of Justinian. The Law of the Twelve Tables was Rome's first law code which was issued in 450 and 449 BC. Justinian I ruled from 527 to 565 AD, 976 to 1076 years after the Law of the Twelve Tables.Justinian I commissioned a collection of books called Corpus Juris Civilis (Body of Civil Law), which was also dubbed Justinian Code in the 16th century. A first edition was published in 529 and a second one in 534. It was a very comprehensive digest of centuries of Roman civil law. It also included collections of essays by famous Roman jurists in two student textbooks. It has provided the basis of the civil law of many modern countries.The Corpus Juris Civilis came in four parts:1) The Codex (book) Justinianus, which was a review of imperial laws going back 400 years (to the time of Hadrian). It scrapped obsolete or unnecessary laws, made changes when necessary and clarified obscure passages. Its aim was to put the laws in a single book (previously they were written on many different scrolls), harmonise conflicting views among jurists which arose from centuries of poorly organised development of Roman law and have a uniform and coherent body of law. It consists of 12 books, 1 book covers ecclesiastical law, the duties of high officers and sources of law, 7 cover private law, 1 criminal law and 3 administrative laws.2) The Digesta is a collection of fragments taken from essays on laws written by jurists (mostly from the 2nd and 3rd centuries) which express the private opinions of legal experts. Most were from Ulpian (40%) and Paulus (17%). It was a large amount of writing which was condensed in 50 books. It was used as an advanced law student textbook.3) The Institutiones is a textbook for first year law students written by two professors. It was a series of extracts from statements on the basic institutions of Roman law from the teaching books by 'writers of authority.' In was largely based on the texts of Gaius, a jurist of the 2nd century AD.4) The Novellae Constitutiones, which contained laws recently issued by Justinian.
The answer depends on what aspect you wish to compare: If you wish to find out if the two variables are correlated one statistical technique is the chi-square test.
Money Supermarket, Compare The Market and Moneyfacts are all websites that offer comparison tools or tables to help one compare credit cards and their reward programs. Further information can also be found on Money Saving Expert.
There are many different locations on the internet in which someone can view and compare reviews. Amazon is a good place to check.
This one is wrong! --> Because Justinian was a tyrant who persecuted his enemies.
One