Yes, Mesopotamians could move up or down the social classes, although social mobility was limited. Factors such as wealth accumulation, military success, or gaining favor with the ruling elite could enhance one's social standing. Conversely, falling into debt, losing property, or being captured in war could lead to a decline in status. Overall, while there were opportunities for movement, the rigid class structure often made it challenging.
Scribes usually wrote:documentsletterstales from the mouths of Egypt's lower classes or from foreign landswrote down records of the city.
The primary source of water in Mesopotamia is from the two rivers, Euphrates and Tigris
its was different because unlike the Han dynasty its started from the most to the least of people. For Ex, in social class there's first emperor , his court and scholars who led government positions then they was the peasant who were second class. Then Third class is the artisans they produce items for daily life and last class were the merchants who just sell what the artisans made.
The Industrial Revolution provided economic opportunities for " the movement of individuals or groups in social standing social position" (wiki definition for 'social mobility') that is, in short, it facilitated a means for them to move between social classes whether this be up or down (loss of agricultural jobs due to industrialisation for example would be going down in class to unemployment, where opportunites for promotion/improvement - due to the emergence of the working class - would have increased)Historical Research on Social Mobility: Western Europe and the USA ... by Hartmut Kaelble has a good definition on page 15 and is free to view on google books.Hope this helps!
they believed in many Gods, as far as I'm aware mesopotanian culture wasn't all unified, there were quite a few different cities up and down the Euphrates, i think i heard they worshipped the sun and moon and the chaldeans (babylonians) had pretty much a whole pantheon of gods
PriestsWarriorsSecretariesPeasants
Social classes have always existed around the world. People have always looked down on those worse off then themselves.
Scribes usually wrote:documentsletterstales from the mouths of Egypt's lower classes or from foreign landswrote down records of the city.
well first of all... the Netherlands is where it's at . yuhh. weird stuff go down. coffee shops nuff' said...
the link between social class and social mobility is social class ia an open system which means people are able to move up and down the social hierarchy resulting in acheiving social mobility but people may also move down the social hierarchy resulting in a lower social class this may occur if a person loses their income , wealth or status .
The primary source of water in Mesopotamia is from the two rivers, Euphrates and Tigris
food, drinks, clothes, jewelry, wine, and other goods up and down the rivers.
In social studies, an upside down triangle could represent a pyramid of power or social hierarchy, where those at the top have the most power or authority and those at the bottom have the least. It can be used to visually represent societal structures and relationships.
People could hold protests, pay the farmer to stop cutting down trees for land or for every tree cut down another musty be planted in its place
Here's the whole taxonomic hierarchy:DomainKingdomPhylumClassOrderFamilyGenusSpecies
it was to show how important people were Also it was mostly about what jobs they had in Egypt's daily life. the pharaoh was at the top of the social pyramid. Peasant farmers were at the bottom part of the social pyramid. The rich looked down upon the bottom.
its was different because unlike the Han dynasty its started from the most to the least of people. For Ex, in social class there's first emperor , his court and scholars who led government positions then they was the peasant who were second class. Then Third class is the artisans they produce items for daily life and last class were the merchants who just sell what the artisans made.