The cold war from the point of view of the people and country's that were being literally destroyed was certainly not the Third world war. However from the point of view of those that make cold hard cash and gain power it was actually better then the second world war.
Vietnam, Korea, Malaysia, Angola, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Afghanistan, Cuba, and perhaps others in which armed conflicts were fought. Some Third World countries, although wars were not fought in them, were still part of the Cold War.
It may have been considered possible once, as the close of World War 2 did lead to the Cold War, which very nearlly turned into a Nuclear war. However it can be said that any Nuclear war could have it's roots in World war 2 as the Nuclear weapon has it's roots in World war 2. Also if a Asian Communist nation was to start World war 3then that could be traced back to the Cold war and that in itself could be traced back to World war 2. It's all just a matter of perspective, for example; many causes of World war 2 have their roots in World war 1 so any war that could be traced back to the Cold war could then be blamed on events of World war 2 and in turn could be linked to the outcome of World war 1. So their is no yes or no answer as it really depends on how you look at it.
The free world and the communist world. Or NATO verses WARSAW PACT.
They provided funding for revolutions. USSR's goal was to turn more nations communism, and they tried to advantage of the 3rd world to do so.
Cold Plunge.
There is no universally accepted definition of "third world country" as it was a term used during the Cold War to categorize countries based on political ideologies. However, based on common understanding, roughly one-third of the world's countries could be considered third world countries.
Each Third World country had a different experience in the Cold War, but those which were lined up with one side or the other at least managed to exist in peace. Those which could not take a definite side were torn apart by internal conflict.
yes it is but it could be first person
Nonaligned
Lebanon is definitely not a third world country. When people say a third world country, they directly think about living in tents, with no running water, and living on a dollar a day. But that is, by far, not the case is Lebanon. Also, i dont think a third world country could have the number 1 bar in the world . Skybar look it up. Hope this helped.
There are no official definitions for first, second, or third world countries. The terms originated during the Cold War, but today, "third world" is often used to describe undedeveloped or developing nations in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, of which Kenya is one, so it most closely fits the connotation of a "third world country."
Many third world countries are dormant players in the cold war. Since the cold war is mostly about outshining the other principle in making new weapons, superior vehicles and new achievements like space exploration, the third war countries are not major participants.
The expression "the third world" came about during the Cold War - it referred then to countries which were not within the sphere of influence of either America or Russia. From that it came to refer to the 'underdeveloped' countries of the world.
theres gonna be one soon. and i think its gonna be called "cole world".instead of cold
No, Ukraine is not considered a third world country. The term "third world" was historically used to refer to countries that were not aligned with NATO or the Communist bloc during the Cold War. Ukraine is categorized as a "developing country" or an "emerging economy" in modern terms.
Non-aligned nations Buffer States
The union with allied countries.