Yes, the delegates could have chosen to amend or revise the existing provisions instead of eliminating them entirely. This approach would have allowed for the preservation of valuable aspects while addressing shortcomings. However, the decision to discard certain elements often reflects a desire for a more fundamental shift or a clean slate, which may be seen as necessary for achieving their broader goals. Ultimately, it depends on the specific context and objectives of the delegates at the time.
wrote a new constitution
The convention that came to be known as the Constitutional Convention or the Federal Convention, meeting in Philadelphia, was instructed by the government under the Articles to revise the existing frame of government. Instead, the delegates decided to throw out the Articles of Confederation and write a new constitution for the nation.
There were 55 delegates, including George Washington (whom the delegates unanimously elected to chair the convention), Ben Franklin (the 'sage' of the convention, and, at 81, it's oldest member), Alexander Hamilton (later in the convention he was stripped of his vote when the other New York delegates left), and James Madison of Virginia (whose scrupulous notes would tell us of the proceedings of the Convention). Rhode Island did not send a delegate. Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were not there because they were serving the country abroad, but they sent letters encouraging the delegates. Patrick Henry did not attend because he "smelt a rat" that the convention, which was purportedly only to revise the Articles of Confederation, would instead write an entirely new document creating a strong federal government "tending toward the monarchy." 39 delegates actually signed the Constitution.
NOBut remember, the accepted spelling of some words has changed over the last 2 centuries. The one in the Constitution that stands out is "chuse" instead of "choose". And if you follow its example for the use of capital letters, you'll get an F in English composition! YESDEFENCE instead of DEFENSE CONTROUL instead of CONTROLIT's instead of ITS in atricle 1PENSYLVANIA instead of PENNSYLVANIA
the penny press changed publishing of newspapers because it made it only 1¢ instead of 6¢
Federal
California does not allocate Republican delegates based on congressional districts. Instead, the state allocates its Republican delegates through a winner-takes-all system that is based on the outcome of the statewide vote in the Republican primary.
Republican delegates to the national convention do not receive a salary or payment for their role as delegates. Instead, they may have their travel and accommodation expenses covered by their state party or the national party. The specific arrangements can vary depending on the state party's resources and policies.
America has changed from 911 by having the airports check everything instead of just checking only half of your stuff they check everything now. Also there getting more strict about the security in the airports now because of 911
America has changed from 911 by having the airports check everything instead of just checking only half of your stuff they check everything now. Also there getting more strict about the security in the airports now because of 911
neither, we should live in the dark.
No, Arizona is not a winner-take-all primary state. Instead, it uses a proportional allocation system for its delegates in presidential primaries. This means that delegates are awarded based on the percentage of votes each candidate receives, rather than the outright winner taking all the delegates.
wrote a new constitution
Sorry, using 'i' instead of 'I' needs to be changed. When referring to yourself it is a capital 'I'.
it had changed by expansion and material such as it was timber they changed it for stone and brick instead !
The delegates settled on a federal form of government instead of a system in which power was not divided between state and national government because they believed that it provided for a much stronger national government with a chief executive (the president), courts, and taxing powers.
The winner-takes-all system is the one under which a candidate who wins the preference vote in a primary automatically receives the support of all delegates in that primary. In this system, there is no proportional distribution of delegates based on the percentage of votes received; instead, the candidate with the most votes takes all the delegates.