no,it is not,as many people die in wars and many children become orphaned,and many wifes become widows,and many families also gets distracted.
wars are not a good way to resolve conflicts because children are orphaned , women are widowed . It dries up the kindness in peoples heart and turns them into worthless brutes . it is doom and destruction for those who wage it and for those who survive it. hence universal brotherhood must be encouraged amongst the people
There are no conflicts between Muslims and Sikhs. Historically, there were wars between the Mughal Empire (which was an Islamic Empire in India) and the Sikhs who revolted and proceeded to create their own empire. There was also violence between Sikhs and Muslims and Hindus during the Independence of India and Pakistan. There is also mild anti-Sikh feeling in Pakistan since Sikhs maintain good relations with Ahmadis, who are are considered Muslim heretics by Sunni Pakistanis. However, general relations between the groups are relatively good. The recent relaxing of tensions between India and Pakistan has allowed for cross-border religious tourism.
If only the human race was that simplistic - -
Where Iran and Iraq are concerned, neither is a "good guy". Both are rather problematic countries at this point. The lesser of two evils in Iraq, but that is not saying much.
All good and raw materials were tighly regulated by mother country.
War is an extension of the political process and often leads to peaceful negotiations .
Some eternal conflicts of man include the struggle between good and evil, the battle between desires and responsibilities, and the tension between freedom and security. These conflicts have been prevalent throughout history and continue to shape human experiences and decisions.
The Religious conflicts is when, one is torn between good and evil.
The southis bad but the north is good! this does not help anyone at all!
For a good will competition between countries
No, wars are not a good way to end conflict between two countries or individual. Wars bring destruction and nothing else. It results in the loss of resources as well as lives. Wars are not the solution of any conflict. Mutual understanding and conversation are the basis of better results for any conflict. Wars bring down the economic conditions of the country as well. Throughout the history, no war has ever ended a conflict. One war has either led to another war or cold war or war-like circumstances. So wars are not at all a good way to end conflicts between countries or individuals. Gandhi won a war without even fighting one.
no but orange juice is good
wars are not a good way to resolve conflicts because children are orphaned , women are widowed . It dries up the kindness in peoples heart and turns them into worthless brutes . it is doom and destruction for those who wage it and for those who survive it. hence universal brotherhood must be encouraged amongst the people
Most of the conflicts which arise between finance and marketing include budget allocations. The marketing department may have a good plan and a budget but the finance department will downplay the idea and allocate less money.
be good
yes
No, wars are not a good way to end conflict between two countries or individual. Wars bring destruction and nothing else. It results in the loss of resources as well as lives. Wars are not the solution of any conflict. Mutual understanding and conversation are the basis of better results for any conflict. Wars bring down the economic conditions of the country as well. Throughout the history, no war has ever ended a conflict. One war has either led to another war or cold war or war-like circumstances. So wars are not at all a good way to end conflicts between countries or individuals. Gandhi won a war without even fighting one.