0
What else can I help you with?
What best describes the relationship between the Byzantine Empire and the Ottoman?
the ottoman overthew the byzantines
What is difference between Hassock and Ottoman?
There is no real difference between Hassock and Ottoman. More exactly, a term Ottoman is more common than Hassock. Also, note that there are Hassock Ottomans too. Hassock is more stuffed than Ottoman. In addition, Ottomans have usually storage inside.
What were the major differences between the Safavid and mughal empires?
The Mughal Empire practiced religious tolerance, while the Safavid Empire oppressed religious minorities.
Who won the ottoman and safavid war?
The Ottoman-Safavid War, particularly the most notable conflict from 1623 to 1639, ended in a stalemate, with the Treaty of Kasr-i Sharif being signed in 1639. This treaty established the borders between the two empires, confirming Ottoman control over eastern Anatolia and parts of the Caucasus, while the Safavids retained control over Persia. Both empires suffered significant losses, but the Ottomans solidified their territorial gains in the region. Overall, the war is considered a strategic victory for the Ottomans.
What was the geographic extent of the ottoman empire during the safavid empire during the reign of shah ABBAs I?
During the reign of Shah Abbas I (1588-1629), the Ottoman Empire and the Safavid Empire were two powerful Islamic states in the region. The Ottoman Empire extended across Southeast Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa, encompassing territories such as modern-day Turkey, the Balkans, and parts of the Arabian Peninsula. In contrast, the Safavid Empire was primarily located in Persia, covering present-day Iran and parts of the Caucasus and Central Asia. The borders between the two empires fluctuated due to ongoing conflicts, particularly in the areas of modern Iraq and eastern Anatolia.
Which of the following describes a major difference between the Ottoman and Safavid empires?
The Ottoman Empire was controlled by Sunni Muslims, while the Safavid Empire was ruled by Shia Muslims.
What is the difference between the ottomans and the Safavid's?
The Ottoman Empire was controlled by Sunni Muslims, while the Safavid Empire was ruled by Shia Muslims.
What is one difference between the Ottoman Empire and the Safavid Empire The Ottoman Empire was based on political organization and the Safavid Empire was based on religious order. The Ottoman Empire?
was a multi-ethnic and multi-religious state that emphasized a centralized bureaucratic system, allowing for a diverse population under a secular governance structure. In contrast, the Safavid Empire was primarily a theocratic state that established Shi'a Islam as the state religion, promoting a singular religious identity that significantly influenced its political and social systems. This difference in governance led to distinct cultural and ideological developments in each empire.
What best describes the relationship between the Byzantine Empire and the Ottoman?
the ottoman overthew the byzantines
What was the reason for conflict between the ottoman and safavid empire?
The Safavid and Ottoman dynasties were both of Turkish ethnicity. The Safavid empire extended from the Caucasia ( Armenia, Azeribijan, etc.) to India, Iraq, the Persian Gulf, and parts of central Asia and the Caspian Sea.The Ottoman empire, on the other hand, ruled the the rest of the Islamic empire (Middle East, Balkans, and North Africa). The Ottoman empire was older and stronger than the young Safavid empire, but the Ottomans were alarmed as the Safavid strength and influence grew and felt their interest was threatened. Moreover, the Safavid followed Shia Islam, while the Ottoman people were followers of Sunni/Sufi Islam. But the main reasons for the conflict are rather political than for sectarian religious factors as many try to force this idea of Sunni/Shia conflict. As the Safavid empire grew, it pushed its territories as far as Iraq and eastern Turkey, carving for itself a considerable chunk of Ottoman territory. This was the point when the Ottomans felt in danger and waged war on their cousins the Safavid.
What is the differences between the ottomans the safavids?
The Ottoman Empire was controlled by Sunni Muslims, while the Safavid Empire was ruled by Shia Muslims.
Which was a major source of conflict between the Ottoman and Safavid empires?
A major source of conflict between the Ottoman and Safavid empires was religious differences, particularly regarding Sunni and Shia Islam. The Ottoman Empire was predominantly Sunni, while the Safavid Empire enforced Shia Islam as the state religion, leading to deep-seated sectarian tensions. These differences fueled military confrontations and territorial disputes, notably during battles such as the Battle of Chaldiran in 1514. Additionally, both empires sought to expand their influence in the region, intensifying their rivalry.
What is difference between Hassock and Ottoman?
There is no real difference between Hassock and Ottoman. More exactly, a term Ottoman is more common than Hassock. Also, note that there are Hassock Ottomans too. Hassock is more stuffed than Ottoman. In addition, Ottomans have usually storage inside.
What is the difference between Shirt and Sunni Muslims?
Ottoman great leader
What were the major differences between the Safavid and mughal empires?
The Mughal Empire practiced religious tolerance, while the Safavid Empire oppressed religious minorities.
What is the difference between hot and beautiful?
There is a huge difference between hot and beautiful. Hot is a word that describes appearance whereas beautiful describes personality.
Who won the ottoman and safavid war?
The Ottoman-Safavid War, particularly the most notable conflict from 1623 to 1639, ended in a stalemate, with the Treaty of Kasr-i Sharif being signed in 1639. This treaty established the borders between the two empires, confirming Ottoman control over eastern Anatolia and parts of the Caucasus, while the Safavids retained control over Persia. Both empires suffered significant losses, but the Ottomans solidified their territorial gains in the region. Overall, the war is considered a strategic victory for the Ottomans.
