No. A slave is owned by someone else. That is what makes them a slave and they are not paid for their labor. The Supreme Court decided they were property and had no rights. Slaves had to have permission to leave the plantation and didn't need money.
No, but in return they were provided food, water and shelter
i think it is money and food
Because other African tribes defeated them in battle and captured them as slaves, then sold them to Europeans. Note, it was other Africans that made slaves of Africans and took them from their homes, not Europeans.
everyone who was taking africans and using them as slaves were profiting from them so africans thought they could do it to make money off of the slaves being taken
Money and Spice and clothes
the African countries were brought slaves were Uganda & rwanda
To make money.
yes
i think it is money and food
Because other African tribes defeated them in battle and captured them as slaves, then sold them to Europeans. Note, it was other Africans that made slaves of Africans and took them from their homes, not Europeans.
Several African tribes were involved in the transatlantic slave trade, including the Dahomey (modern-day Benin), Ashanti (modern-day Ghana), and Yoruba (modern-day Nigeria). These tribes engaged in capturing and selling slaves to European and Arab traders in exchange for goods and weapons.
because by selling or trading slaves they earned money for their economy
the cause was to get African slaves and trade them for money and for their own use.
the british took African slaves across from Africa to America to trade and earn money
we would lose our money
everyone who was taking africans and using them as slaves were profiting from them so africans thought they could do it to make money off of the slaves being taken
1619
to replace Indian slaves with African slaves