0
What else can I help you with?
Why did the middle colonies depend more on indentured servants than slaves?
Becouse they did not use agriculture
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indentured servants?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
Did servants came to Jamestown?
Yes, servants did come to Jamestown, primarily as indentured servants. Many early settlers were bound by contracts to work for a certain number of years in exchange for passage to America, food, and shelter. This system was crucial for the labor-intensive tobacco economy that developed in Virginia. Over time, the reliance on indentured servitude shifted towards the use of enslaved Africans as the primary source of labor.
Why did African slavery replace indentured servants?
Indentured service worked for a benefit and for a set amount of time (often years.) However, slaves were worked for no benefit, and for free. Basically, slaves were profitable and didn't settle to pay off debts.
How did slavery develop in the southern colonies and why?
The Southern Colonies develop in mid-1600,Africans and European indentured servants work fields. Indentured servants leave plantations and buy their own farms. Try to force Native Americans to work; they die of disease or run away. planters use more enslaved African laborer's 1750,235000 enslaved Africans in America; 85 percent live in south.
How did the use of indentured servants help the Jamestown settlement?
how did the use of indentured servant help and hurt the Jamestown settlement
Use indentured servant in a sentence?
In the 1800's, there were over 10,000 Indentured Servants in Jamestown, Virginia.
Which colony has few slaves but many indentured servants?
The colony with few slaves but many indentured servants was Virginia. In the early days of the colony, before the widespread use of African slaves, indentured servants from England were a significant source of labor.
Why did Chesapeake planters use black slaves more than indentured white servants after 1680?
declining death rates made slaves more profitable than indentured servants
Why couldn't plantation owners in the colonial days use indentured servants?
Slaves cost much less: to buy and to care for than indentured servants.
What would plantation owners prefer slaves instead of indentured servants?
they coulld use slaves longer
Why would landower rather use slaves than indentured servents?
Landowners preferred using slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a lifelong and inheritable source of labor, while indentured servants could only work for a limited period of time. Slaves were also considered to be a more profitable and reliable workforce as they were seen as a long-term investment. Additionally, the racial hierarchy of the time often justified the use of slaves over indentured servants.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves indentured servants?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
Why did the middle colonies depend more on indentured servants than slaves?
Becouse they did not use agriculture
Why would landowners use slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners preferred using slaves over indentured servants because slaves provided a lifetime of unpaid labor, while indentured servants worked under a limited contract. Slaves were considered property and could be bought and sold, providing a stable source of labor. Additionally, slaves were seen as a long-term investment, as their children also became slaves, ensuring a generational workforce.
Why was there little use of indentured servants or slaves in New England?
it was an impractical place to cultivate cash crops.
Why would landowners use slaves then indentured servants?
Landowners used slaves because they provided a lifetime of labor with minimal upfront costs, while indentured servants had set terms of service and eventually gained their freedom. Slaves were seen as a long-term investment, while indentured servants were a temporary labor solution. Additionally, slaves were often considered property, providing greater control and power to the landowner.
