He abandoned his father and tried to take his brothers (Richard 2 the lion heart) kingdom by force, while he was away on crusades.
of course he had a family. a mom is family,a dad is family and with out those he would not exist. dugh!! =]
Nobody has ever liked King John. He may have had support from one group or another at any given time, but that was only because he was king and powerful - not because anyone liked the guy.
King John's quarrel with the pope was about who they wanted to be the archbishop of Canterbury. This had an effect on England because of the quarrel the pope stop any services for 7 years this was called an interdict .
King Richard I - the "Lionheart" (1157 - 1199) and his wife, Queen Berengaria, did not have any children. Richard was succeeded by his brother John.
he was very upset and did not agree to any of it
King Herod and his family despised John the Baptist and were responsible for his death.
king john the 3rd
noone knows
yes. my family is related to king kamehameha
any of his male siblings if none then to male family members
Yes. He had King George The 3rd, The King of England.
The Republic of Guinea has no king or any royal family. It is a presidential republic.
He had pretty much the same responsibilities as any other medieval king
depends on the game but ussually she has a father who is king.
yes
The previous answer is completely false. There is no EVIDENCE to suggest that King John had any involvement in the disappearance of Arthur. It is only speculation. The most popular rumor is that King John had the boy assassinated by Lord William de Braose.
Preventing any children of British royalty from being named John ever again.