No, Rome's harbor was 15 miles away at Ostia.
Fertile soil, harbors and rivers and a long growing season
Baltimore, New York City, and Boston have harbors.
Rocky and arid land did encourage them. Natural harbors, plentiful resources, and long growing seasons did not.
The Middle Colonies (New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New Jersey) enjoyed natural harbors, excellent fishing and whaling, iron ore in the mountains, timber, and good soil and growing season for wheat, rye, and other crops.
The Roman civilisation was not built. It evolved. Much of this evolution was influenced by the Etruscans, Rome's neighbours to the north (Rome was on the River Tiber, which was the border betweeb Etruria, Land of the Etruscans, and Latium, Land of the Latins) and the Greeks of southern Italy.
The geographic feature is Natural Harbors :)
Rome
yes
Africa had very few natural harbors to help with trade. A jagged coastline would result in deeper waters and better natural harbors.
60 natural harbours and we have about 34,000 coral reefs
Your grammar is a bit...ambiguous, but perhaps you mean "did Europe's navigable rivers and good natural harbors make trade difficult? If this is the case, then the answer is no. Rivers and harbors HELPED European trade. Goods could be moved up rivers or into natural harbors for docking, making trade easier.
Its natural resources were timber, fish, and deep harbors.
Because New Jersey didn't have any natural harbors.
peni sand vagina
the natural resorces of rome is olives
The two largest natural harbors in California are the San Francisco Bay and the Humboldt Bay. They are located on the North Coast of California.
to have more fresh water