0
What else can I help you with?
In the feudal system were there any advantages for the peasants?
No, there was no advantage to being a peasant. The feudal system was designed to benefit the upper classes, not the lower. People did not choose to be peasants, they were forced into that role.
Why did peasants enjoy strong support under mongol rule?
The Mongols gave strong support to the peasants and peasant economy of China, believing that the success of the peasant economy would bring in additional tax revenues and ultimately benefit the Mongols themselves.
Which class of Russian society probably didn't benefit from Peters Reforms and why?
The peasantry likely did not benefit from Peter the Great's reforms. While his efforts modernized the military and government, they often reinforced serfdom and increased the burdens on peasants, who faced higher taxes and labor demands. Additionally, the focus on modernization and Westernization prioritized the interests of the nobility and urban elites, leaving the rural population largely unchanged in their hardships. As a result, the socioeconomic status of the peasantry remained largely stagnant or even worsened during this period.
What kind of people were not helped by the magna carter?
King John did not benefit from the Magna Carter because he was a very biased man and if he signed it (which he did) he had to follow the law and he had to become fair and loyal to his people. And the barons (rich people) and average people benefited from this.
What roman group did not benefit the Roman Roads?
The Roman roads primarily benefited the Roman military and trade, facilitating the movement of troops and goods across the empire. However, rural peasants and lower-class farmers often did not benefit from these roads, as they were marginalized and had limited access to the economic opportunities that the roads provided. Instead, they faced increased taxation and exploitation as the empire expanded, leading to a disparity in the advantages gained from the infrastructure.
How did the Russian revolution change the lives of village people?
The Russian Revolution of 1917 significantly altered the lives of village people by dismantling the feudal system and redistributing land, which aimed to empower peasants and improve their economic conditions. Many peasants gained access to land previously owned by aristocrats, allowing them to cultivate crops for their own benefit rather than for landowners. However, the subsequent collectivization policies in the late 1920s often led to hardship, as many were forced into collective farms, resulting in food shortages and resistance. Overall, while the revolution initially promised better conditions, it also brought about significant upheaval and challenges for rural communities.
Why did peasants and women benefit little from the Renaissance?
they had fewer rights
Why was force necassary to get grain from the peasants during world war communism?
Because why would a peasant willingly give up his/her grain? Here it is in a nutshell: Look up agricultural collectivization and kulaks while you're at it. Stalin wanted to industrialize so one of the reasons he enslaved the peasants/land was to pay for industrialization. The money raised from the seized grain of the state farms paid for industrialization by being sold on the international market. Industrializing the country stalin claimed would benefit the soviet union.
In the feudal system were there any advantages for the peasants?
No, there was no advantage to being a peasant. The feudal system was designed to benefit the upper classes, not the lower. People did not choose to be peasants, they were forced into that role.
Which class of russian society probably didn't benefit from peter's reforms?
the farmers
What was the two reasons that many peasants opposed the revolution?
It was hostile toward the Catholic Church. It was unlikely to benefit them personally.
Why did peasants enjoy strong support under mongol rule?
The Mongols gave strong support to the peasants and peasant economy of China, believing that the success of the peasant economy would bring in additional tax revenues and ultimately benefit the Mongols themselves.
How was life similar for peasants and slaves in Aztec society?
Both peasants and slaves in Aztec society had limited rights and freedoms, such as not owning property or being able to move freely. Additionally, both groups were expected to provide labor for the benefit of the ruling classes, whether through agricultural work or serving in households or temples. Both peasants and slaves were socially marginalized and had little opportunity for social mobility.
Did the leaders of the Russian revolution keep their promises?
To a point. If you take the three popular slogans as the promises ("Power to the workers, land to the peasants, peace to the peoples"), then workers did become the most celebrated and nominally ruling class, although the true power belonged to the Communist elite, army and secret police, the land was taken away from the landowners and wealthy peasants and converted into collective farms for all to work on and benefit form, though not to own, and Russia did pull out of WWI, but a bloody Civil War broke out immediately followed by years of Stalin's rule of terror.
Which class of Russian society probably didn't benefit from Peters Reforms and why?
The peasantry likely did not benefit from Peter the Great's reforms. While his efforts modernized the military and government, they often reinforced serfdom and increased the burdens on peasants, who faced higher taxes and labor demands. Additionally, the focus on modernization and Westernization prioritized the interests of the nobility and urban elites, leaving the rural population largely unchanged in their hardships. As a result, the socioeconomic status of the peasantry remained largely stagnant or even worsened during this period.
How might the Russian economy further benefit by extracting plutonium from the spent fuel in its possession?
Building nuclear reactors with plutonium fuels and Pu-Be neutron sources.
What kind of people were not helped by the magna carter?
King John did not benefit from the Magna Carter because he was a very biased man and if he signed it (which he did) he had to follow the law and he had to become fair and loyal to his people. And the barons (rich people) and average people benefited from this.
