No, there was never any known contact that William Wallace had with any Irish recruit, that story is taken from the film Braveheart, which is saturated with historical inaccuracies, despite being a great film, it should be accepted on the understanding that what you see in it is mostly complete nonsense in terms of historical accuracy.
In truth, the Irish, whom were known as the 'Hiberni' at this time, were actually enemies of the Scots, a lesser enemy than the English, but just as much an enemy none the less, the Irish often sided with the English and sometimes did double deals with the Scots and English;
One example in particular is that when the brother of King Robert I of Scots, Edward Bruce, was offered the position of being King of Ireland if the Scots drove the English out from the Southeast of Ireland, at the loss of the battle of Faughart, an Irish peer Sir John De Bermingham, had the dead body of Edward Bruce quartered and his head salted, then sent to Edward II of England to be put on display, while the rest of Edward Bruce's body was sent to various towns around Ireland.
William Wallace really existed.
he is believed to be loaded because he was the second son of a minor noble but noone really knows.
the story of William Wallace is very much like the film; you just remove every single little detail of story, scenery, dialogue, and a good bit of the characters, voila.
In "Braveheart," the character of Princess Isabelle, who is portrayed as having a romantic connection with William Wallace, is a fictionalized version of historical events. There is no historical evidence to suggest that William Wallace and Isabelle had any romantic relationship or that she became pregnant by him. The film takes significant creative liberties with history for dramatic purposes. In reality, Isabelle was married to King Edward II of England, and her relationship with Wallace is largely a fabrication for the storyline.
No. Braveheart, whilst being an exciting film, was full of historical inaccuracies. Isabella's firstborn, Edward III was born on 13 November 1312, William Wallace was executed on 23 August 1305. So a physical impossibility!
William Wallace really existed.
he is believed to be loaded because he was the second son of a minor noble but noone really knows.
the story of William Wallace is very much like the film; you just remove every single little detail of story, scenery, dialogue, and a good bit of the characters, voila.
In "Braveheart," the character of Princess Isabelle, who is portrayed as having a romantic connection with William Wallace, is a fictionalized version of historical events. There is no historical evidence to suggest that William Wallace and Isabelle had any romantic relationship or that she became pregnant by him. The film takes significant creative liberties with history for dramatic purposes. In reality, Isabelle was married to King Edward II of England, and her relationship with Wallace is largely a fabrication for the storyline.
Difficult question, it really is not know if Wallace was married or not,, even his own birth date is not certain and is quoted as being between 1260 and 1278.. However Marion Braidfute has been suggested.
No. Braveheart, whilst being an exciting film, was full of historical inaccuracies. Isabella's firstborn, Edward III was born on 13 November 1312, William Wallace was executed on 23 August 1305. So a physical impossibility!
No Lauren Wallace is a student in Britain.
No, it is unlikely that the two ever even met.
Actually I don't think you can recruit any Pokemon really easy
recruit by robert muchamore
its the difficulty level regular is easy recruit is really easy
Not really, it was directed by Mel Gibson who is an Australian, but the movie revolves around William Wallace who is a Scottish hero and it is set in Scotland so it is more a Scottish movie.