No. Not all Ancient greek city states allow slaves b/c the laws are different and some rich people don't need slaves or don't have the money to afford one
The Ancient Stadium of Olympia had seating made of mud for about 20,000 spectators as well as a special seating area for spectators. Sitting was allowed, though many onlookers stood to get a better view or to cheer for contestants.
Yes, they wanted to include slaves within their population because it would allow more representatives to be able to join Congress and speak the "voice" of the Southern states.
Figitive slave act
Alabama seceded from the Union in 1861 on January 11th because Alabama was one of the states where it was allowed to hold slaves and the other states wouldn't allow it so Alabama wanted to be part of the CSA so they could hold slaves so they seceded from the USA. krL(:
There wasn't slavery in the northern states because back in the late 1700's and early through mid 1800's the country was basically split in half. The southern states believed that having slaves isn't wrong, it was okay. But in the northern states people thought slavery is wrong so they didn't allow slaves. In the North, plenty of other people thought slavery was OK, but saw that it didn't fit the industrial system. Factory bosses didn't want slaves, they wanted free mobile labour.
Slaves were simply for work.
The southern states did not agree with slavery so offered runaway slaves homes, food and care.
nowadays, all states let their slaves enter the militia
States in the north did not allow slavery until the 1830s. It was also illegal to bring slaves to the west and midwest.
the reason the northern states allowed slave trade to continue was so they could have laws they wanted passed to be agreed with by the southern states. within doing this, there was a compromise and the northern states agreed to it. so, the slaves we left as property to the plantation owners and northern states didn't have to return run away slaves to their owners.
Maryland, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Carolina
No. It enabled Lincoln to keep four important states loyal, when they might have been driven into the arms of the Confederacy if he had enforced abolition there.
Slaves are only allowed to do what their owners allow them to do.
One problem that arose in Georgia due to not allowing slaves was a shortage of labor in agricultural and other industries. This led to higher labor costs and reduced productivity compared to neighboring states that did allow slavery.
Yes, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 empowered slave hunters to retrieve escaped slaves from free states like Massachusetts and return them to their owners in slaveholding states. The law required citizens and law enforcement officials in free states to assist in capturing and returning runaway slaves, leading to increased tensions and resistance in these states.
It allowed the slave states to count most of it's slaves in order to have more representation by population. The non-slave states discouraged slavery and put in the 3/5ths clause because of it. It was not meant to mean a slave was only 3/5ths of a man as some would have you believe.
If you mean the ghosts of the dead, they were judged there in ancient Greek myth. Yet, it also depends upon the interpretation of the myth.