In 1798 England, formal education was not universally accessible to children. While some children, particularly from wealthier families, attended private schools or were tutored at home, many poorer children had limited or no access to education. The establishment of public education systems was still in its infancy, and compulsory schooling laws would not be enacted until the 19th century. As a result, education was often inconsistent and dependent on social class and location.
Yes, the children had to go to school back then.
It depended in which colony, but if you are talking about the new England colonies, the answer is yes, puritans encourage the education and the found Harvard university
Roman children went to school for the same reasons that modern children go to school-- to get educated and to get the rewards that an education can bring.
Yes they did. Part of the colonial pattern was to build a church and then a school. It was considered a priviledge to get an education, and the local colonists paid a school teacher to teach their children.
No, poor children did not go to school during Tudor times. During this time period very children went to school or were educated.
95%
Monday to Friday inclusive.
the teacher
Year one usually begins when the child is 5-years-old.
Most children in Victorian England never went to school. They were taught at home and sent out to work to help support the family. School became mandatory in 1880 and children went to school until they were 10.
His children go to the same school as mine.
Yes children in Kuwait do go to school.
yes it's like England the schools are free but there's tax.
no if they were poor they did not go to school. If the children were rich then they could go to school.
Yes, the children had to go to school back then.
Yes; children of any country go to school.
they do go to school