no they supporte
merchants and business owners
Farmers
The Federalists were better organizes and had more experience. Novanet :)
they wrote the federalists essays in which they pleaded their case
Federalists did not support wealthy farmers as leaders because they believed that a strong central government led by a more educated and elite class was essential for maintaining order and promoting economic growth. They were concerned that wealthy farmers, while influential, might prioritize their own interests over the broader needs of the nation. Additionally, Federalists favored a balance between different social classes in governance to ensure stability and prevent the dominance of any one group. Hence, they looked to a more diverse leadership that included merchants and professionals rather than solely agrarian interests.
It was Southerners and anti-federalists who most strongly opposed Hamilton's economic plans. One of Hamilton's more controversial plans was the creation of a national bank.
The poorer debtors and farmers.
farmers
Farmers
Farmers
farmers
Most anti-federalists consist of lower case merchants and farmers. So to answer your question, most anti-federalists were not wealthy.
heo
to gain the support of the Anti-Federalists to ensure slaves could not vote to gain the support of the Anti-Federalists
The Federalists were better organizes and had more experience. Novanet :)
I do not know the exact answer, but federalists were for the U.S. Constitution.
they wrote the federalists essays in which they pleaded their case
Federalists did not support wealthy farmers as leaders because they believed that a strong central government led by a more educated and elite class was essential for maintaining order and promoting economic growth. They were concerned that wealthy farmers, while influential, might prioritize their own interests over the broader needs of the nation. Additionally, Federalists favored a balance between different social classes in governance to ensure stability and prevent the dominance of any one group. Hence, they looked to a more diverse leadership that included merchants and professionals rather than solely agrarian interests.