I doubt that they thought about the serf one way or the other. The serf was to do the work and didn't require much thought from his master.
No, the masters of serfs provided neither food nor clothes. They provide farming fields and homes. The serfs grew their own food and made much of their own clothes.
the vassals are the kings slaves and the serfs are like a nun and monks
In historical contexts, serfs are not considered slaves. Serfs were tied to the land they worked on and owed labor and other obligations to their lord, but they were not considered property like slaves.
serfs where like slaves but they could leave serfdom is like slavery but the serfs could leave they just wouldn't have a place to live as they did being a serf to someones home
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
No, the masters of serfs provided neither food nor clothes. They provide farming fields and homes. The serfs grew their own food and made much of their own clothes.
He freed all of the serfs from their boyar masters
He freed all the Serfs from their boyar Masters
He freed all of the serfs from their boyar masters
He freed all the Serfs from their boyar Masters
He freed all of the serfs from their boyar masters
a serfs house was plane and old
the vassals are the kings slaves and the serfs are like a nun and monks
Serfs houses were very poorly constructed. They were made out of mud or sticks
A Spartan slave was called a helot. Helots were state-owned serfs required to work the land for their Spartan masters.
very harsch
In historical contexts, serfs are not considered slaves. Serfs were tied to the land they worked on and owed labor and other obligations to their lord, but they were not considered property like slaves.