Of course it does! it wouldn't be in history books if it didn't
No, in the day.
The Boston Massacre was not a war, and it did not happen during a war. The Boston Massacre was a confrontation between a rowdy mob of people in Boston and a small detachment of British troops. Five civilians eventually died of wounds received during the event.
The Boston Massacre was in the Massachusettes colony. (Boston, Massachusettes)
The Boston Massacre happened in 1770 and the Boston Tea Party happened in 1773.
Paul Revere made and sold copies of Henry Pelham'sengravings of the Boston Massacre. Another engraver, Jonathan Mulliken, also made and sold prints of the event
The Boston Massacre happened in Boston, Massachusetts.
The Boston Massacre happened in Boston (hence the name).
No, in the day.
The Boston Massacre was not a war, and it did not happen during a war. The Boston Massacre was a confrontation between a rowdy mob of people in Boston and a small detachment of British troops. Five civilians eventually died of wounds received during the event.
The Boston Massacre was in the Massachusettes colony. (Boston, Massachusettes)
The Boston Massacre happened in 1770 and the Boston Tea Party happened in 1773.
Paul Revere made and sold copies of Henry Pelham'sengravings of the Boston Massacre. Another engraver, Jonathan Mulliken, also made and sold prints of the event
the purpose of the Boston massacre was that the people in Boston didn't want the british in their "city", and that is what led up to the Boston massacre
the boston massacre was an act of murder
The name Boston Massacre not accurately describe what happened because it wasn't really a massacre. It is likely that the soldiers were cornered and threatened by a mob and fired in self defense. They were tried and acquitted.
One other war that the redcoats fought in besides the Boston Massacre (which really wasn't a "massacre" because only five people were killed) was the Revolutionary War.
A guard from the Boston Massacre.