answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What side did the author of common sense argue for?

Thomas Paine is one of the preeminent patriots.


What panhlet did thomas Paine argue that was wrong for the Britain to control the American colonies?

Common Sense


For what reason was common sense written?

Common Sense was written by Thomas Paine in 1776 to argue for American independence from British rule. It aimed to persuade the American colonists to support the idea of independence by providing logical and moral arguments against the British monarchy. It became one of the most influential pamphlets of the American Revolution.


What are some advantages about monarchy?

One could argue that a clear line of succession is an advantage of a monarchy. From the perspective of the monarchy, absolute power would be another advantage.


'I can't argue with someone so adorable' does that make sense?

Yes it makes sense.


Is argue common noun?

No, the word 'argue' is a verb (argue, argues, arguing, argued).The noun forms of the verb to argue are argument and the gerund, arguing.


Why does he always argue with you?

They like to be right or they feel a sense of insecurity.


What is the diffence between consumerism and greed?

some would argue that greed propels not only mindless consumerism, but the pursuit of wealth, often at the expense of common sense and any allegiance to the common good. By: MeLoDy CuEvAs


Did america argue in d-day?

Please re-write so that makes some kind of sense.


What types of conflict are most common?

#1 Conflict. Argue about living with Parents when you financially incapable


Did John Hancock argue that writs of assistance were against common law?

screw you all and this site


Is North Korea a monarchy?

NO. This is debated, but the general consensus is that North Korea is a Dynastic Communist State, not a monarchy.A dynastic communist state is a country whose rulers are from the communist party but has succession in leadership passing along a dynastic line like a monarchy. Some consider Dynastic Communism to be a form of Absolute Monarchy, because of the key similarity between Dynastic Communism and Absolute Monarchy being the transfer of total power along hereditary lines. However, the majority argue that since the leader of a Dynastic Communist State does not use royal titles, the state is not a proper monarchy.