0
Did the Emancipation Proclamation violate the Constitution and was this responsible for any positive or negative aspects of the war?
The January 1863 Emancipation Proclamation by President Lincoln did not violate the Constitution; however, it did not have any Constitutional basis, which generated criticism from both Southerners and (some) Northerners alike. That this criticism was a new adversity to be dealt with by Lincoln and his supporters is undeniable: it did not, however, deter the North from its march toward victory in any ultimately significant way.
What else can I help you with?
What was one negative effect for the Union caused by the Emancipation Proclamation?
As George B. McClellan and other conservatives predicted, the Emancipation Proclamation did intensify the South's commitment for their fight for independence. This because it threatened both the property interest in slaves and the social interest in preserving White supremacy. However, it did to a certain extent drive a wedge between the owners of large plantations and the small Southern farmer.
Why did the members of Lincoln's cabinet urge him to wait before announcing the emancipation of southern slaves?
Because they were losing all their battles in Virginia, and it would have looked like a desperate measure.
Which state did not have a representative to sign the constitution?
Rhode island. It is said that the reason why is that Rhode Island feared that it would have a negative effect on its economy.
How did the Louisiana purchase have a negative effect on the union?
The US Constitution states that any power that the Constitution does not expressly give to the federal government or does not expressly deny to the states belongs to the states or the people. The Constitution does not say that the President has the power to purchase land on behalf of the country. Pres. Jefferson defended his action by stating that since the Constitution gives the federal government the right to control federal land, it naturally follows that the federal government has the right to acquirefederal land.
What was the proclamation act of 1763's reaction?
The Proclamation Act of 1763, issued by the British government, aimed to stabilize relations with Native Americans by prohibiting colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. The reaction among colonists was largely negative; many viewed it as an infringement on their rights and aspirations for westward expansion. This dissatisfaction fueled resentment towards British authority and contributed to the growing tensions that eventually led to the American Revolution. Colonists felt that their sacrifices during the French and Indian War were being disregarded, further deepening their discontent.
What was one negative effect for the Union caused by the Emancipation Proclamation?
As George B. McClellan and other conservatives predicted, the Emancipation Proclamation did intensify the South's commitment for their fight for independence. This because it threatened both the property interest in slaves and the social interest in preserving White supremacy. However, it did to a certain extent drive a wedge between the owners of large plantations and the small Southern farmer.
Why did the members of Lincoln's cabinet urge him to wait before announcing the emancipation of southern slaves?
Because they were losing all their battles in Virginia, and it would have looked like a desperate measure.
If there is negative equity on your car when it is repossessed are you responsible for the difference?
It may vary by state, but in most palces you are responsible for the negative equity.
What negative particle is responsible for electricity?
electrons.
The negative particle also responsible for electricity is the?
electron
What is the electron part of an atom responsible for?
Negative charge
What were the positive and negative reactions to the constitution as it went to ratification by the states?
25
What parts of the atom are concerned with charge?
The electron is responsible for the negative charge while the proton in responsible for the positive charge.
Is responsible positive or negative?
It's positive because it means you're responding.
Is responsible a negative or a positive?
It depends.* Being a "responsible person" is usually considered a positive trait. * On the other hand, if you are (for example) the person "responsible" for breaking the window, that's not a good thing.
Was lincoln the negative or affirmative side?
Abraham Lincoln is generally viewed as the affirmative side in the context of his leadership during the Civil War and his efforts to abolish slavery. He championed the Emancipation Proclamation, which declared the freedom of slaves in Confederate states, and he worked to pass the 13th Amendment, which formally abolished slavery in the United States. His presidency was marked by a commitment to preserving the Union and promoting equality, aligning him with progressive ideals of his time.
What has been done to correct the negiative consecuences of the cotton gin?
To address the negative consequences of the cotton gin, particularly the exacerbation of slavery in the United States, various abolitionist movements emerged, advocating for the emancipation of enslaved people. Legal measures, such as the Emancipation Proclamation and the eventual passage of the 13th Amendment, were implemented to abolish slavery. Additionally, educational initiatives and economic alternatives to cotton farming have been promoted to reduce dependency on enslaved labor. Efforts continue today to acknowledge and rectify the historical injustices associated with this period through reparative justice and social equity initiatives.
