Yes, but probably for all the wrong reasons. It was not just freedom that was wanted, it was also the freedom to own slaves and to establish the southern plantation lifestyle that they had been forced to leave behind. It was not freedom of religion that they sought, it was freedom from the Catholic religion.
It DID win The Alamo. In fact, it became such a massacre (all 189 colonists were killed) that thousands of volunteers from southern states became so enraged that they helped Texas win its independence war against Mexico. If Mexican president Santa Anna hadn't slaughtered all those colonists, opting to have them arrested instead, he would have prevented the massive wave of supporters to the Texan cause, eventually allowing Mexico to reclaim its lost territory.
Mexico
The Law of April 6, 1830, imposed restrictions on immigration from the United States to Texas, aiming to curb the growing influence of Anglo settlers. This legislation heightened tensions between the Mexican government and Texan colonists, who viewed it as an infringement on their rights and economic interests. The law also encouraged the Mexican military presence in Texas, leading to increased friction and contributing to the eventual push for Texan independence. Ultimately, it solidified the divide between the two groups and fueled resentment among the colonists.
Mexico fought against Texan colonists, the United States and France in defensive wars. It also fought for the Allies during WW2:Texas War of Independence (1835-1836)First Franco-Mexican War ("The Pastry War") (1838)Mexican-American War (1846-1847)Second Franco-Mexican War (1862-1867)US Occupation of Veracruz (1914)US Punitive Expedition (1916-1917)World War Two (1942-1945)
Both. Texans is plural. Texan's is singular possessive. If you're talking about more than one Texan, it's Texans. If you're talking about something belonging to only one Texan, it's Texan's.
Mexico had recently revolted against its mother country, Spain, in the Mexican War of Independence before fighting the Texan patriots in the Texas Revolution.
defended the colonists against Native Texan raids.
The desire for Texan Independence from Mexico.
It DID win The Alamo. In fact, it became such a massacre (all 189 colonists were killed) that thousands of volunteers from southern states became so enraged that they helped Texas win its independence war against Mexico. If Mexican president Santa Anna hadn't slaughtered all those colonists, opting to have them arrested instead, he would have prevented the massive wave of supporters to the Texan cause, eventually allowing Mexico to reclaim its lost territory.
Mexico
Yes. Stephen F. Austin dealed with Mexico, although he was a Texan.
because mexico had intvited american settlers to live in texas because there were not a lot of peole there. NOTE: soon after this texan americans revolted and over welmed mexican forces claiming texas as their own independent country before joining the U.S
Mexico. Think Tex-Mex.
Settling of the Texan territories.
Because the Mexicans were treating them unfairly
Mexico, the land of his enemies, because his friends, the Texan were out to kill him.
Stephen F. Austin