The government historically broke many treaties made with Native Americans, often prioritizing expansion and resource acquisition over honoring agreements. Numerous treaties were signed under duress or false pretenses, and subsequent policies frequently disregarded their terms. This pattern of treaty violation contributed to significant loss of land, culture, and autonomy for Native American tribes. While some treaties were upheld, the overall trend has been one of broken promises and unfulfilled commitments.
Many of the treaties were never meant to be honored by the US government, but just made to 'pacify the savages'. It can certainly be argued, however, that those negotiating the treaties meant them to be honored. The biggest problem was that none of the treaties was ever ratified by Congress, so therefore in the eyes of the government, the treaties were invalid. Then there was the issue of who would see to their enforcement if the whites were to break the treaties.
The simplest answer is all of them. To date there is no single "promise" (treaty obligation) given by the United States that has been honored.
dawes act
Native American groups were communal and Americans were very individualistic. The federal government sought to break Native Americans of their communal nature and force them to assimilate with the Dawes Severalty Act of 1887. The Act gave citizenship and 160 acres of land to the heads of households of individual Native American families or 80 acres to single adults or orphans. Adults could not gain full title to the property for 25 years. The Bureau of Indian affairs even sent Native American children to boarding schools to force assimilation.
They knew that the government would break the treaties and they didn't want to assimilate into a world where they still would be discriminated against and treated unequally. When the children went to the schools they were not allowed to speak their language, practice culturally, nor dress in native dress. Once there they were not allowed to go home and they stayed until they were 21. By that time they were neither Native American nor part of the white society. Your question reads as if you think they should have signed the treaties I suggest you read the book BLACK ELK SPEAKS.
The United States government negotiated thousands of treaties with the Indians over the centuries. Every single one was broken as the settlers wanted more lands, or they wanted gold or other metals. The treaties were just a temporary means of the government getting what it wanted at the moment but as soon as those needs changed, someone would break the treaty. a native americans and settelers had differing concepts of land ownership
The federal government wanted the Native Americans to become farmers.
Many of the treaties were never meant to be honored by the US government, but just made to 'pacify the savages'. It can certainly be argued, however, that those negotiating the treaties meant them to be honored. The biggest problem was that none of the treaties was ever ratified by Congress, so therefore in the eyes of the government, the treaties were invalid. Then there was the issue of who would see to their enforcement if the whites were to break the treaties.
The government broke its treaty with the Native American tribes primarily due to pressures from westward expansion and the desire for land. Economic interests, including the pursuit of resources and agricultural development, often overshadowed commitments made in treaties. Additionally, changing political leadership and public sentiment frequently led to a disregard for previous agreements, resulting in further marginalization of Indigenous communities. This pattern of broken treaties has had lasting impacts on Native American rights and sovereignty.
In the late 1800s, the American government sought to assimilate Native Americans through policies such as the Dawes Act of 1887, which aimed to break up tribal lands into individual allotments for farming. This legislation encouraged Native Americans to adopt European-American lifestyles and abandon traditional communal living and cultural practices. Additionally, the government established Indian boarding schools that enforced English language and Western education, often suppressing Native cultures and languages. These efforts were part of a broader agenda to integrate Native Americans into mainstream American society, often with detrimental effects on their identities and communities.
The simplest answer is all of them. To date there is no single "promise" (treaty obligation) given by the United States that has been honored.
dawes act
dawes act
dawes act
dawes act
they went to war over sackagiua
They knew that the government would break the treaties and they didn't want to assimilate into a world where they still would be discriminated against and treated unequally. When the children went to the schools they were not allowed to speak their language, practice culturally, nor dress in native dress. Once there they were not allowed to go home and they stayed until they were 21. By that time they were neither Native American nor part of the white society. Your question reads as if you think they should have signed the treaties I suggest you read the book BLACK ELK SPEAKS.