In a word, no - because the bourgeoisie were also members of the Third Estate and paid taxes. They and the peasants and the urban proletariat, all resented that the Clergy (First Estate) were exempt from nearly all taxes and the Nobility (second Estate) were exempt from a number of them - both the first two estates having also some powers to collect a certain amount of taxation for themselves.
No, there was no advantage to being a peasant. The feudal system was designed to benefit the upper classes, not the lower. People did not choose to be peasants, they were forced into that role.
Supported by the labor of the peasants.
king nobles knights peasants
1. Church Officials, Nobles2. Knights3. Peasants
the bailiff sits between the lords(or nobles) and the serfs(or peasants)
They supported the entire feudal system by working the land.
No, there was no advantage to being a peasant. The feudal system was designed to benefit the upper classes, not the lower. People did not choose to be peasants, they were forced into that role.
Supported by the labor of the peasants.
king nobles knights peasants
nobles owned land, peasants were tied to land
1. Church Officials, Nobles2. Knights3. Peasants
In Europe's Feudal System, peasants were the lowest class and were treated like slaves.
They had to pay 10% of their income or crops
the bailiff sits between the lords(or nobles) and the serfs(or peasants)
In feudal society, most people were peasants. In many countries the peasants were mostly serfs.
Peasants were at the bottom level of feudal society.
In the feudal system, taxes were collected by the lords or nobility from the peasants who worked the land. The peasants were required to provide goods or services in exchange for the protection and use of the land. Each lord had the authority to establish and collect taxes within their own domain.