answersLogoWhite

0

No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.

No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.

No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.

No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.

No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.

No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.

No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.

No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.

No, not usually. A Roman citizen was immune from torture and so were freedmen in the late republic. Only a slave or a non-citizen could be tortured.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?