answersLogoWhite

0

No, only one parent needs to be a citizen for someone to be considered a natural born citizen.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

5mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What are the two ways to be born an American citizen?

There are two different ways in which a natural born citizen can be created. By American law, all people born on American soil are considered natural born citizens. In addition, people who are born overseas to American parents are also classified as natural born citizens.


What are ways to become a US citizen?

Born in the United States with/without parents citizens, become a citizen through taking classes and the citizenship test, serve in the US military.


In what ways was Athens not a true democrocy?

The main criticism of ancient Athenian democracy is the limitations Athenian law placed upon who could be considered a citizen. The only Athenians who were considered full citizens were Athens-born men of at least 18 years of age. And to be considered Athens-born, both of one's parents had to have been citizens. But while women could be considered citizens, they had no voice in the Assembly, and no real rights within the democracy. Furthermore, slaves had no voice whatsoever in the Athenian democracy.


How could a foreigner become a citizen in ancient rome?

By speaking at least a little Latin and by doing a civic service for Rome, a foreigner could become a citizen. However there were other ways. For example an entire town or territory could be granted citizenship for various reasons such as loyalty to Rome during a crises and being located on a trade route.


Was Barack Obama's father a US citizen?

No, Barack Obama's father, Barack Obama Sr., was of Kenyan citizenship when the President was born. His father was in the United States to study as a foreign exchange student, where he met the President's mother. The President's mother was a natural born US citizen from Kansas. President Obama could not have been a natural born citizen because in the Constitution (article 2 section 1) it requires both parents to be US citizens: "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States." Because Barack Obama Sr. was not a US citizen the current president is effectively breaking the law stated in the constitution.

Related Questions

Is Tim Tebow an American citizen?

His parents were American citizens, so even though he was born in the Philippines he is a "natural-born" US citizen.


If both parents are Israeli citizens and the child is born overseas is the child a Israeli citizen?

Yes. In fact, even if only one of the parents is Israeli then the child is considered an Israeli citizen.


Who can become a naturalized citizen Anyone born A inside the US B outside the US if both parents are US citizens C outside the US to non-US citizens D in a US possession if one parent is a US citizen?

There are one way to become a naturalized citizen. A person that was born outside the United States to parents who aren't citizens of the US. Explanations: A child born in the USA from parents who are both already US citizens do NOT need "naturalized". All are natural citizens. A child outside the US if both parents are US citizens is accepted as a US citizen. A child born in a US possession if one parent is a US citizen qualifies for natural US citizenship.


What would happen if Chester Arthur was a Canadian?

He wouldn't have been president of the United States, for one thing--only a natural-born citizen of the United States can be that. "Natural born citizen" doesn't mean you have to be born within the territorial limits of the US. If your parents were in the Army and were stationed in Italy, and you were born in an Italian hospital, you're considered natural born because both your parents were US citizens.


List 4 ways in which someone would be considered a roman citizen?

Four ways to be considered a Roman citizen are: 1) Have parents who are citizens. 2) Be appointed a citizen for some outstanding service. 3) Be a citizen of a town or territory that was granted blanket citizenship 4) Serve in a auxiliary unit of the Roman army. Depending on the times and circumstances, a freed slave could also be considered a citizen, and if he were not, his children would be citizens.


What are the two ways to be born an American citizen?

There are two different ways in which a natural born citizen can be created. By American law, all people born on American soil are considered natural born citizens. In addition, people who are born overseas to American parents are also classified as natural born citizens.


Is a person born on a US military base in a foreign country a natural born US citizen?

A person born on an air base is an American citizen. Of course, this is only true if the parents are American citizens.


Are children with parents with no papers US citizens?

As per the current US Immigration Law, If the child is born in the US, then it will be considered to be a US citizen, irrespective of the illegal status of its parents.


If your grandparents are citizen can automatically be a citizen?

No, citizenship goes from descent, the parents must be citizens also.


Is a person born on a flagged us ship a natural born citizen?

Although the U. S. Constitution does not define natural born citizen, the Congressional Research Service has found numerous historical and legal writings that indicate that a natural born citizen is anyone who legally and Constitutionally qualifies as a U. S. citizen at the time of birth, including those who are born abroad to U. S. citizens and those born in the U. S. to foreign parents. Therefore, someone born on any ship is a U. S. citizen if his/her parents are. If the parents are not U. S. citizens, he/she is a citizen if the ship is within U. S. territorial waters at the time of birth. However, a person born on a flagged U. S. ship in international or foreign waters is not a U. S. citizen if neither of his/her parents is a U. S. citizen.


Is Barack Obama considered to be a natural born citizen when one of his parents is a foreigner?

He may have been born in Hawaii, but the Supreme Court in 1800's set the precedence that the constitutional interpretation of "natural born citizen" requires both parents to be US citizens. Therefore if one parent is not a citizen of the united states of America, then the person does not qualify as a natural born citizen and cannot be president of the united states of America. This was and is the only time the Supreme Court has ever ruled to define the meaning of "natural born citizen" and it is therefore the only precedence and cannot be changed until after the Supreme Court decides another definition should take precedence. Since that did not occur before Obama became president, he is not legally our president. **SEE BELOW**A person born in the US is a "natural born citizen" (with minor exceptions, e.g., children of diplomats). Even the children of undocumented aliens are citizens when born in the US. **SEE BELOW**Generally speaking a person born in the US is a "natural born citizen". However this does not apply when determining if a person meets the qualifications to be President of the USA - Again the constitution did not define "natural born citizen" so the Supreme Court did in terms of meeting qualifications to be President of the USA - They determined that both parents must be US citizens to qualify as "natural born citizen". Your opinion in paragraph 2 above does not take presedence over the Supreme Court of the land. I know many have been mis-lead on this birther issue in terms of whether or not Barack Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya - that is not the issue. The issue is whether or not both of his parents were US citizens to meet the Supreme Court Decision. In his case, they both were not US citizens and that is the real issue. **SEE BELOW**The Supreme Court decision referred to above has to do with persons born OUTSIDE THE US - see related link. It does not apply to Barack Obama, who was born in the State of Hawaii. The Supreme Court has consistently refused to hear lawsuits claiming that Mr. Obama is not a US citizen.**SEE BELOW**Here are some excerpts from law experts on the subject - note both parents must be US citizens for a natural born to be a citizen."The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens." (Emphasis added.)"It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens."This class is specifically defined as "natural-born citizens" by the Court. The other class - those born in the US without citizen "parents" - may or may not be "citizens". But the Minor Court never suggested that this other class might also be natural-born citizens.It's quite the opposite. The Minor Court makes clear that this class are not Article 2 Section 1 natural-born citizens. If this other class were natural-born there would be no doubt as to their citizenship.This class is specifically defined as "natural-born citizens" by the Court. The other class - those born in the US without citizen "parents" - may or may not be "citizens". But the Minor Court never suggested that this other class might also be natural-born citizens.It's quite the opposite. The Minor Court makes clear that this class are not Article 2 Section 1 natural-born citizens. If this other class were natural-born there would be no doubt as to their citizenship.The Minor Court refrained from making a "citizenship" determination as to that class, but the Court did note that they were a different class. Later, in 1898, the Court in Wong Kim Ark took the question on directly as to who is a citizenunder the 14th Amendment, but that case did not directly construe Article 2 Section 1, whereas Minor did.In order to avoid construing the 14th Amendment, the Court in Minor had to define those who fit into the class of "natural-born citizens". Mrs. Minor fit into that class. Mr. Obama does not.This is so very evident by the fact that the Minor Court specifically states that the "citizenship" of those who have non-citizen parents was historically subject to doubt. Whether the 14th Amendment nullified those doubts was irrelevant to the Court in Minor, since Mrs. Minor was a natural-born citizen.The 14th Amendment specifically confers only"citizenship". In Minor, the US Supreme Court directly recognized that natural-born citizens were a class of citizens who did not need the 14th Amendment to establish citizenship. The class of natural-born citizens was perfectly defined in the Minor case.Therefore, we have a direct determination by the US Supreme Court which defines a natural-born citizen as a person born in the US to parents who are citizens. The citizenship of this class has never been in doubt. The citizenship of the other class was in doubt. But even if that doubt was erased - as to their citizenship - that they are not natural-born citizens was established as precedent by the Supreme Court in Minor. In order for that precedent to be reversed, one of two things are necessary:- a Constitutional amendment which specifically defines "natural-born Citizen" more inclusively than Minor did , or;- a Supreme Court case which overrules the definition of natural-born citizen in the Minor caseWe have neither.Minor was decided seven years after the adoption of the 14th Amendment. The Supreme Court in Minor did not consider anyone but those born of citizen parents on US soil to be natural-born citizens. Later, in Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court stated that persons born on US soil to (some) alien parents were "citizens", but that case specifically construed only the 14th Amendment.So, there you have it folks - Obama is not considered a natural born citizen because one of his parents was not a citizen of the USA.


What is a native born citizen?

Any person who is born in US territory is considered as a native born citizen,(Children born of diplomats in foreign embassies within the US are not natural born US citizens because foreign embassies are considered to belong to nation that owns the embassy. ) There is a question about whether children born of US citizens outside of the US are natural born . This phase appears in the US Constitution as one of the requirement of the president, but the Supreme court has never ruled on its exact meaning.