Sometimes because in the Assassination at Sarajevo the story of the murder of Archeduke Franz Ferdinand shows thar sometimes events in history rely upon chance
Without a time perspective, history would be just a jumble of factoids. History is the story of the progress of mankind, and so dates, times, periods are an integral part of the story of progression and regression.
Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.
Yes, conclusions related to historical events often rely on subjective evaluations of existing evidence, as historians interpret artifacts, documents, and testimonies through their own perspectives and biases. Additionally, the availability and reliability of sources can vary, leading to differing interpretations. While rigorous methodologies can help mitigate subjectivity, complete objectivity is challenging in the study of history. Thus, conclusions are often influenced by the historian's context and the prevailing narratives of their time.
There was none. You may be thinking of the French princess Isabella but she and Wallace never met. Don't rely on the movie 'Braveheart' for accurate history.
why did the colonies come to rely on their elected legislure
an organism that rely on the panda is ,well sometimes bears have parasites in them like .flees
the field of history. Historians often rely on primary sources such as letters, diaries, and official documents to gain firsthand accounts and evidence of past events. By analyzing these sources, historians can construct a more accurate and nuanced understanding of historical events and their significance.
Scientists rely primarily on the fossil record to determine evolutionary history. Another way of determination is examining the genetic record.
Indigenous cultures, such as Native American tribes, often rely on oral history to pass down traditions, stories, and customs from one generation to the next. African cultures, especially those with rich storytelling traditions, often use oral history to preserve historical events, legends, and cultural practices. Pacific Islander cultures, like the Maori of New Zealand or the Hawaiian Indigenous people, may rely on oral history to maintain their cultural heritage and ancestral knowledge.
Observations
Sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn't. It depends on whether you want to rely on the answers given.most of the time yes
Scientists must sometimes rely on estimates when they cannot obtain exact numbers :)
yes it helps people show things in a unique way sometimes...............................
You can buy it at GNC or sometimes a smoke shop.
Scientists rely primarily on genetic data, particularly DNA sequences, to determine evolutionary history. By comparing the genetic similarities and differences between different species, scientists can infer relationships and construct evolutionary trees. This approach is known as molecular phylogenetics.
Because they all have a personal agenda they are on .
Because you should have a real life. Internetting is useful sometimes, but don't rely on it.