answersLogoWhite

0

As a xenophobic troglodyte, I cannot disagree more emphatically. If anything, the Separate but Equal doctrine was not taken far enough.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What Supreme Court decision allowed for the segregation of blacks in separate but equal facilities?

The Supreme Court decision that allowed for the segregation of blacks in separate but equal facilities was Plessy v. Ferguson, decided in 1896. The Court upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine, asserting that as long as the separate facilities for blacks and whites were equal, segregation did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This ruling legitimized state-sponsored segregation until it was eventually overturned by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.


What did separate but equal lead to?

The doctrine of "separate but equal," established by the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, justified racial segregation in public facilities, asserting that separate facilities for black and white individuals were constitutional as long as they were equal. However, in practice, this led to systemic discrimination, with facilities for African Americans often being vastly inferior. The inherent inequality and injustice of this doctrine fueled the Civil Rights Movement, ultimately leading to the landmark Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, which declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional.


What was the elimination of the practice of providing separate schools and other public facilities for each racial group called?

The attempt to undo segregation was called desegregation.The elimination of "separate but equal" schools and other public facilities came about during the Civil Rights movement and a major Supreme Court case. The case of Brown v Board of Educationdeclared that school segregation was a violation of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution. The court was unanimous in its decision to overturn Plessy v Ferguson, which had allowed for "separate but equal" facilities.


In what case did the US Supreme Court rule that separate but equal is a contradiction in terms?

Although the Court didn't explicitly state "separate but equal" was a contradiction in terms, the actual quote makes it clear they thought it was:"We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal."Case Citation:Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What was the law that allowed for separate facilities?

The law that allowed for separate facilities, particularly in the United States, was the Jim Crow laws, established in the late 19th century. These state and local statutes enforced racial segregation in public facilities, schools, transportation, and more, under the doctrine of "separate but equal." This legal framework was upheld by the Supreme Court's 1896 decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, which legitimized racial segregation until it was challenged and ultimately overturned by the Civil Rights Movement in the mid-20th century.

Related Questions

What do these numbers imply for the decision of when to open a shared facility versus two separate facilities?

We can not answer your question because you have not told us what "these numbers" are.


What Supreme Court decision allowed for the segregation of blacks in separate but equal facilities?

The Supreme Court decision that allowed for the segregation of blacks in separate but equal facilities was Plessy v. Ferguson, decided in 1896. The Court upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine, asserting that as long as the separate facilities for blacks and whites were equal, segregation did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This ruling legitimized state-sponsored segregation until it was eventually overturned by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.


What was Supreme Court's decision in Brown v Board of Education of Topeka?

Public schools should be integrated.


What is the connection between the plessy v Ferguson case and the brown v board of education case?

Plessy v. Ferguson ruled in 1896 that separate, but "equal" facilities for blacks and whites were constitutional (but they ended up not being "equal" at all). Brown v. Board of Education overturned this ruling, stating that separate but "equal" schools for blacks and whites were unconstitutional.


What was the immediate effect of the Plessy v. Ferguson decision?

The immediate effect of the Plessy v. Ferguson decision was to legalize segregation and establish the "separate but equal" doctrine in the United States. This decision upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities.


What Supreme Court Justice gave the following decision in the landmark case that made separate but equal facilities legal Our constitution is colorblind and neither knows nor tolerates classes among?

The landmark decision that established the "separate but equal" doctrine was delivered by Justice Henry Billings Brown in the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson. The ruling upheld racial segregation laws for public facilities, stating that separate facilities for blacks and whites were constitutional as long as they were equal. This phrase about the Constitution being colorblind is often associated with Justice John Marshall Harlan's dissent in the same case, which argued against the majority's decision.


The landmark civil rights case of Brown v Board of Education rendered invalid the decision in which Supreme Court case?

Brown vs. Board overturned the Supreme Court decision of Plessy vs. Ferguson. That decision ruled that having separate facilities for African-Americans and white people was constitutional so long as these facilities remained equal. Brown vs. Board proved that these separate conditions were not kept equal, and Plessy vs. Ferguson was overturned.


Which earlier decision did the Supreme Courts 1954 Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka Kansas decision reverse?

The Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education reversed the earlier decision made in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which upheld the "separate but equal" doctrine. This precedent had allowed for racial segregation in public facilities, asserting that separate educational institutions for different races were constitutional as long as they were equal. Brown v. Board declared that segregated schools were inherently unequal, thus unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.


What year was the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka case determined?

The Supreme Court ruled that segregation in schools is illegal. States could not establish separate schools for black and white students because "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." This landmark decision occurred in May 1954.


Declared that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal?

On May 17, 1954, in their unanimous decision in the case of Brown vs. Board of Education (Oliver L. Brown, et al. vs. the Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, et al.), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the racial segregation of school students is unconstitutional. On May 18, 1896, in their decision in the case of Plessy vs. Ferguson, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it is not a violation of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution to provide accommodations to whites only as long as accommodations of equal quality were also provided for blacks. This became known as the "separate but equal" doctrine. However, in the Brown v. Bd. of Ed. decision 58 years later, the Court determined that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." "Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities? We believe that it does... Segregation of white and colored children in public schools has a detrimental effect upon the colored children. The impact is greater when it has the sanction of the law, for the policy of separating the races is usually interpreted as denoting the inferiority of the negro group. A sense of inferiority affects the motivation of a child to learn. Segregation with the sanction of law, therefore, has a tendency to [retard] the educational and mental development of negro children and to deprive them of some of the benefits they would receive in a racial[ly] integrated school system... We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment." - U.S. Supreme Court, May 17, 1954


What did separate but equal lead to?

The doctrine of "separate but equal," established by the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, justified racial segregation in public facilities, asserting that separate facilities for black and white individuals were constitutional as long as they were equal. However, in practice, this led to systemic discrimination, with facilities for African Americans often being vastly inferior. The inherent inequality and injustice of this doctrine fueled the Civil Rights Movement, ultimately leading to the landmark Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, which declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional.


What was the outcome(s) of the landmark decision of Plessy v. Ferguson.?

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that came to be known as separate but equal.