Yes,the South should have paid more attention to its industrial growth.People out there were building machines and making inventions.But the South focused too much on the crops and the cotton.
Yes, the South should have paid more attention to its industrial growth, as it could have diversified its economy and reduced its reliance on agriculture, particularly cotton. By investing in industrial development, the South could have created more job opportunities, improved infrastructure, and enhanced overall economic resilience. This shift could have mitigated some of the economic challenges faced during and after the Civil War, fostering a more balanced and sustainable growth trajectory.
Britain was against industrial growth in this area. They didn't supply any incentives to industrial growth or help the nations that make up South Asia obtain this in any way. This caused rampant poverty throughout the area and post poned the nations demographic transition, thus causing birth rates to remain high. Recently improvements have been made in South Asia so the average birth rate is around 2.7 (ideal is 2.1). In prior years though the average was as high at 7 ish. Test tomorrow?
Cotton was king in the industrial revolution. The South thought that cotton was the key to their prosperity.
Lack of educated work force is one factor that limited industrial expansion in the South.
The south had a choice to have more slaves.
Yes, the South should have paid more attention to its industrial growth, as it could have diversified its economy and reduced its reliance on agriculture, particularly cotton. By investing in industrial development, the South could have created more job opportunities, improved infrastructure, and enhanced overall economic resilience. This shift could have mitigated some of the economic challenges faced during and after the Civil War, fostering a more balanced and sustainable growth trajectory.
One measure of industrial development in the South was the growth of industry
The industrial production growth rate is 5%, and the annual GDP growth rate is 3.1%
An early obstacle to industrial growth in South America was the scarcity of coal. The continent therefore predominantly relied on its petroleum reserves
It encouraged industrial developments across the world
Before the civil war it didn't affect the south, but after the war began the north had all the industrial growth and could produce things needed for fighting a war.
sunbelt
Britain was against industrial growth in this area. They didn't supply any incentives to industrial growth or help the nations that make up South Asia obtain this in any way. This caused rampant poverty throughout the area and post poned the nations demographic transition, thus causing birth rates to remain high. Recently improvements have been made in South Asia so the average birth rate is around 2.7 (ideal is 2.1). In prior years though the average was as high at 7 ish. Test tomorrow?
Johannesburg is South Africa's financial and industrial center.
The north had an industrial based economy. The south had an agricultural based economy.
Industrial growth in South Carolina during the Reconstruction period was driven by investments in textile manufacturing, increased demand for goods in the post-Civil War era, and the availability of cheap labor due to the abolition of slavery. The state's abundant water resources also played a role in the expansion of industries like textile mills.
Sherri Liberman has written: 'A Historical Atlas of Azerbaijan (Historical Atlases of South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East)' 'A historical atlas of the industrial age and the growth of America's cities' -- subject(s): Cities and towns, Growth, History, Industrial revolution, Juvenile literature, Maps for children