0
What else can I help you with?
What did the delegates to the Constitutional Convention need to find a way to balanced?
The delegates to the Constitutional Convention needed to find a way to balance the interests of large and small states, particularly in terms of representation in Congress. They sought to address the concerns of slaveholding states versus free states regarding the counting of slaves for representation and taxation. Additionally, they aimed to balance federal and state powers to ensure an effective yet limited government. Ultimately, they crafted compromises, such as the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise, to achieve this balance.
What key issues did delegates have to compromise in order to create a constitution that most states would agree on?
Delegates at the Constitutional Convention faced significant issues that required compromise, notably representation and slavery. The Great Compromise established a bicameral legislature, balancing the interests of both populous and smaller states by creating the House of Representatives and the Senate. Additionally, the Three-Fifths Compromise addressed the contentious issue of slavery by counting enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes. These compromises were essential in gaining broader support for the Constitution among the states.
Why would the compromise on counting slaves be called the three-fifths compromise?
Instead of counting all slaves for population to determine electoral votes, they only counted slaves as 3/5 of a person to calculate the electoral votes. Before this they didn't count any of the slaves as part of the population when calculating electoral votes.
The Connecticut compromise the great compromise while the three fifths compromise was called the sectional compromise do you think these are appropriate terms?
Yes, the terms "Connecticut Compromise" and "Great Compromise" are appropriate as they both refer to the same agreement that established a bicameral legislature, balancing the interests of large and small states. The term "Three-Fifths Compromise," often labeled a "sectional compromise," accurately reflects the contentious agreement between northern and southern states regarding the counting of enslaved individuals for representation and taxation. Both terms highlight the compromises made to address differing regional interests during the Constitutional Convention.
What constitutional compromise dealt with the issue of counting slaves?
i think you ask your teacher because the answers can help you find something about ur homework because home work make you smarter and go level ur grade
How did the delegates to the Constitutional Convention deal with slavery?
By counting 60% of slaves for the purposes of representation and taxes. All delegates to the Convention recognized that this was an imperfect compromise to a difficult issue, but many of the delegates redesigning American government didn't want to deal with slavery at all. by counting 60% for all slaves--APEX
How did the delegates compromise about enslaved people?
By using the 3/5ths compromise.Only counting 3 out 5 slaves to be counted as 1.
How did delegates settle the problem of slaves counting towards a states population?
3/5 Compromise
Why would the compromise on counting slaves be called the three-fifths compromise?
Instead of counting all slaves for population to determine electoral votes, they only counted slaves as 3/5 of a person to calculate the electoral votes. Before this they didn't count any of the slaves as part of the population when calculating electoral votes.
One of the compromises made between northern southern state during the constitutional convention of 1787 concerned?
counting slaves in the population
How did William Paterson feel about counting slaves as part of the population?
William Paterson believed that counting slaves as part of the population would give more political power to states with larger slave populations, potentially increasing their representation in government. He opposed such a practice and advocated for counting slaves as three-fifths of a person in determining representation in Congress, as outlined in the Three-Fifths Compromise during the Constitutional Convention.
The Connecticut compromise the great compromise while the three fifths compromise was called the sectional compromise do you think these are appropriate terms?
Yes, the terms "Connecticut Compromise" and "Great Compromise" are appropriate as they both refer to the same agreement that established a bicameral legislature, balancing the interests of large and small states. The term "Three-Fifths Compromise," often labeled a "sectional compromise," accurately reflects the contentious agreement between northern and southern states regarding the counting of enslaved individuals for representation and taxation. Both terms highlight the compromises made to address differing regional interests during the Constitutional Convention.
What compromise was reached that eventually led to the ratification of the constitution?
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which balanced the needs of both large and small states. It established a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives based on population and the Senate granting equal representation to each state with two senators. Additionally, the Three-Fifths Compromise addressed the issue of slavery by counting three-fifths of the enslaved population for taxation and representation purposes. These compromises were crucial in facilitating the ratification of the Constitution by addressing the diverse interests of the states.
How did the delegates resolve the issue of representation?
The debate at the Constitutional Convention regarding representation occurred between small states and large states. A deal with struck with the Connecticut Compromise, which included proportional representation in the House of Representatives based on population.
What compromise solved the issue of how to count slaves toward the population?
The Three-Fifths Compromisewas a compromise between Southern and Northern states reached during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 in which three-fifths of the enumerated population of slaves would be counted for representation purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives. It was proposed by delegates James Wilsonand Roger Sherman.
What constitutional compromise dealt with the issue of counting slaves?
i think you ask your teacher because the answers can help you find something about ur homework because home work make you smarter and go level ur grade
What were the major issues and solutions reached at the Constitutional Convention?
"Should states be represented equally or in proportion to their population? Both, according to the Connecticut compromise, states have equal representation in the senate, but representation in the house is by population. What should be done about slaver/How should slave be represented in the house of representatives? Congress was silent on this issue, besides saying they could not be imported after 1808/By counting them as 3/5 a person. Should the right to vote be based on universal manhood suffrage, or should it be very restricted? Finesse the issue. Let the states decide qualifications for voting.
