William the Conqueror's army wasn't weak as he managed to take over other lands and they were well-equipped unlike other armies. This put him at advantage making him more powerful and strong.
Allowed the army to grow without being destroyed outright. (Weak militarys revert to guerrilla warfare; until they're strong enough to fight conventionally).
Mainly because the army was strong. Caligula inherited a strong loyal army and maintained it. Nero also had a strong army and good generals. Even though those two emperors may not have had an ideal personal life, it's no reason to think that they didn't keep their eye on political and foreign situations.
they were weak!
Justinian let the army control him.
The answer is yes because they had a strong army who attacked the Romans army.
To build a strong government and army because the government was poor, weak, and unstable.
To build a strong government and army because the government was poor, weak, and unstable.
it is weak and strong because it neutralises acids. So its strong not weak but weak not strong.
The Monroe Doctrine was initially weak because the United States didn't have a strong army or navy when it was passed.
William the Conqueror's army wasn't weak as he managed to take over other lands and they were well-equipped unlike other armies. This put him at advantage making him more powerful and strong.
it doesn't matter how big an army is, it is whether they are well trained and equipped, for example the British Army is't huge but they are well trained and equipped for any situation
weak is not strong
Well one problem is that they do not have a strong central government and have a weak army hahahaha GO AMERICA
no Philippines is very strong like USA. Philippines is more army, tanks and jets.
antonym comes from the greek, anti, meaning opposite, so the opposite of weak is strong.
Screwdrivers can have weak or strong magnetism.