There is not anything that is the same between these two cultures, it is easier to explain the differences as this: European colonists, and their American descendants; pretend to want or strive for a governmental and cultural system of freedom for all while supplying the needs of all when in reality they do not practice any portion of that purposed belief system.
As examples: Religion: European's / Americans, purport to support religious freedom for all religions while in reality they disdain, reject, bad mouth, and force these others to endure their religion while rejecting any attempt to endure the others religion. Simply look at your own money, or pledge of allegiance, to understand that - also note that "God" is well understood (at least in America) to mean the "Christian God" and no other. Government: European's / Americans, purport to stand for an open and honest government that protects the freedom of its citizens when in reality the US Government is one of the most corrupt (dollar for dollar) of any government on earth, and there is no "redress of grievance" allowed either in a political sense, or through the court systems. The USA has a constitution (supreme law of the land) and it contains one crime, Treason (death penalty offense), but even with this every single member of government (in the USA) commits this crime on a daily basis and nothing is done about it. Please also note that any attempt to do something, report the crime to the Grand Jury, ends with you in jail or shot to death. Native governments executed these people for those crimes without any delay. Classification system: European's / Americans have introduced, and find much pleasure in, a classification system. This system denotes others as (for a limited example) White Trash, Red Necks, etc.etc... Native American's see others as members or non-members of the tribe, with very little overall difference in rights. Please note that this is only a small example of the differences between these cultures, there would not be enough room (or time to read it) to list them all.
How were civil liberties denied Japanese Americans during World War II.
Evaluate the results is the answer
Outsourcing can lead to cost savings, increased efficiency, and access to specialized skills, allowing companies to focus on core competencies. However, it also raises concerns about quality control, potential job losses, and the risk of dependence on external suppliers. Additionally, outsourcing can lead to communication challenges and cultural differences that may affect collaboration and project outcomes. Ultimately, the decision to outsource should weigh these advantages against potential drawbacks based on the specific context and goals of the organization.
To evaluate data
To verify information you retrieve from the Internet you can use these criteria to evaluate the source.
Evaluate differences between 2 (or more) items
A cultural lens is an analytical tool that helps professionals understand and evaluate cultural values. Developmental practitioners and policy makers use the programming tool for more effective development programming.
Cultural and subcultural differences can impact perceptions of abnormality by influencing what is considered acceptable behavior within a society or group. What may be viewed as abnormal in one culture could be deemed normal in another, leading to varying levels of stigma or acceptance. Subcultural norms within a society may also shape how certain behaviors or characteristics are labeled as abnormal, affecting individuals' experiences and access to support or treatment.
cultural bias
The "cultural turn" of the 1960s ultimately placed culture much higher on the sociological agenda
How were civil liberties denied Japanese Americans during World War II.
Comparing two things involves looking at their similarities and differences in order to evaluate their relative characteristics or qualities.
Yes, it is possible to evaluate other cultural practices without being ethnocentric by adopting a culturally relativistic perspective. This approach encourages understanding and appreciating cultural practices within their own context, rather than judging them against the standards of one's own culture. Engaging in open-minded dialogue, active listening, and seeking to understand the beliefs and values of other cultures can mitigate biases and promote respectful evaluation. Ultimately, fostering empathy and cultural sensitivity is key to objective assessment.
Evaluate your choices before you make a decision.The doctor will evaluate the test results. She will evaluate our scores.
The four steps in being a cultural critic typically include observation, analysis, interpretation, and evaluation. First, one observes cultural phenomena, such as art, media, or social behaviors. Next, the critic analyzes these observations for underlying themes and contexts. Then, they interpret the implications of their findings, and finally, they evaluate the cultural significance, often providing insights or critiques that provoke thought and discussion.
Evaluate your choices before you make a decision.The doctor will evaluate the test results. She will evaluate our scores.
Sociologists evaluate, teach and disseminate information about family interactions and norms, cultural groups, and demographic changes within society. They will publish studies of the changes within society, that indicate social inequalities due to lack of cultural adaptations, and the attitudes within families, groups, or individuals, that contribute to a lack of cultural awareness and understanding. These may lead to a change in societal structure, and breakdown within groups, or by understanding the changes a strengthening of society, and cultural groups.