answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, this is true; if the telegraph had been in existence at that time, then the War of 1812 would not have happened because the telegraph could have sped up communications between England and the U.S.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Had the telegraph been in existence the War of 1812 might never have occurred.?

If the telegraph had been in existence at that time, then the War of 1812 would not have happened because the telegraph could have sped up communications between England and the U.S.


Had the telegraph been in existence the war of 1812 might never have occured?

If the telegraph had been in existence at that time, then the War of 1812 would not have happened because the telegraph could have sped up communications between England and the U.S.


What is a sentence with the word occurred?

A full moon has just occurred. That never occurred to me.


What if 9-11 never had occurred?

we will never know.


How would Europe and the rest of the world might have been different if World War 1 never occurred?

WW2 would've been WW1.


When did Tallahassee become a state?

Tallahassee has never been a state. It is a city. But you might be asking when it became the state capital of Florida, and that occurred in 1821.


How did telegraph change peoples live?

go to a diffrent internet and never come back


How does the never to be differ from the never was?

The never to be is something that never will occur, whereas the never was is something that has never occurred. They are both non-existent - however, the universe is entropic and is always moving into the future. From a subjective perspective, the never to be is something that you can prepare for: you can prepare for what might happen, and you can prepare for what might not happen. From an objective perspective, the universe is not deterministic: inherent quantum uncertainties (the Heisenberg Principle) describe this. Therefore, we can only predict to very high probabilities what will be and will never be. Therefore while both are non-existent, the non-existent future might stilll happen. A non-existent past never has existed (but may still happen, in which it become an existent past). In this instance the never was is not the never to be. It never was and never will be. There's irony for you. If the non-existent past never has and never will occur, then the never was is the never to be. So to sum up: They are both non-existent. They are the same if the non-existent past will never occur/the non-existent future never has occurred. They are different when the non-existent future has occurred in the past.


Which of the seven wonders might never have existed at all?

The existence of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon is debated among historians, with some suggesting it may have been a fictional creation or later embellishment. There is limited archaeological evidence to definitively prove its existence.


When in the 20th century persecution of Christians occurred?

never


Had Britain given each colony the degree of self-government found in Connecticut and Rhode Island the Revolution might never have occurred Do you agree or disagree Explain?

The revolution would likely still have occurred, because more of the colonies had grievances and less self-government.


How was the telegraph viewed?

It was an inovative and magical process that changed the world and many thought that the process would never be improved.