It seems you're referencing a historical or fictional context where someone is using foreign mercenaries for destructive purposes. This scenario often highlights themes of power, exploitation, and the consequences of war. Such actions can lead to significant loss of life and suffering, as well as political and social upheaval. The use of mercenaries underscores the moral complexities of warfare and the human cost involved in military endeavors.
Mercenaries are hired soldiers who serve in foreign armies for pay. They are typically not citizens of the country they are fighting for and are motivated by financial gain rather than loyalty to a cause or country.
German mercenaries were notably hired by various European powers during the 18th century, particularly during the American Revolutionary War, when Britain employed them, including Hessian troops, to fight against American colonists. Additionally, during the Thirty Years' War, various German states and foreign powers hired mercenaries to bolster their armies. These mercenaries were often sought for their military expertise and discipline.
Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.
After the rise of the "Bolshevik Revolution" in 1917-18, Russia as a whole was plunged into a period of general disruption and civil war, with phases of greater and lesser chaos dominating in various parts of the large country. Into the 1920s, "Red" and "White" armies fought to take control, with foreign armies and mercenaries also involved quite frequently.
the invasion of France by several foreign armies
the answer is pathos for apex :)
the answer is pathos for apex :)
Mercenaries are hired soldiers who serve in foreign armies for pay. They are typically not citizens of the country they are fighting for and are motivated by financial gain rather than loyalty to a cause or country.
German mercenaries were notably hired by various European powers during the 18th century, particularly during the American Revolutionary War, when Britain employed them, including Hessian troops, to fight against American colonists. Additionally, during the Thirty Years' War, various German states and foreign powers hired mercenaries to bolster their armies. These mercenaries were often sought for their military expertise and discipline.
In which conflict? Mercenaries have seen service throughout the world. In fact, mercenaries predate standing armies. Thus, a wide range of weaponry has been used by mercenaries.
Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.Definitely ancient Rome would win in a battle against ancient Egypt. The Roman armies were better equipped and better trained and had the grit to keep pounding the ememy. The Egyptian armies, especially those when Rome's armies were at its strongest, were mostly mercenaries hired by the Ptolemies.
The Muslim culture changed Cordoba by the Muslims treaties, mercenaries, and standing armies.
After the rise of the "Bolshevik Revolution" in 1917-18, Russia as a whole was plunged into a period of general disruption and civil war, with phases of greater and lesser chaos dominating in various parts of the large country. Into the 1920s, "Red" and "White" armies fought to take control, with foreign armies and mercenaries also involved quite frequently.
A mercenary is a (usually) paid soldier fighting in a conflict in which he doesn't belong to either side. Many medieval kings and rulers hired mercenaries to fill out their armies. Mercenaries, or soldiers-for-hire, are still used today by some countries.
the invasion of France by several foreign armies
l;k'o]o
Most probably not. US mercenaries operating in a CZ (Combat Zone) which contains massive amounts of US troops would not be profitable (nor healthy) for a "soldier of fortune." Money (or other fortunes) are worthless to dead mercenaries. The closest were the CIA operatives (Ravens, etc.). Mercenaries traditionally do well where both survival & profits go hand in hand; which largely means operating in an area which does not contain large numbers of opposing GOVERNMENT armies. Mercenaries thrive in regions that are normally "un-civilized", which enables them to "basically do as they want" or "need to do" to collect that paycheck.