0
Analogy can be used in an inductive argument by drawing parallels between two similar situations or entities to support a conclusion about one based on evidence from the other. By demonstrating that two things share relevant characteristics, the argument suggests that what holds true for one is likely to hold true for the other. This method helps to strengthen the inductive reasoning by providing relatable examples, although the strength of the analogy significantly influences the argument's validity. Ultimately, a well-crafted analogy can enhance the persuasiveness of the inductive argument.
What else can I help you with?
What is an argument that starts from aspecific idea to get a general conclusion?
An argument that starts from a specific idea to reach a general conclusion is known as inductive reasoning. For example, if you observe that the sun has risen in the east every day of your life, you might conclude that the sun always rises in the east. This specific observation leads to a broader generalization about the behavior of the sun, despite the possibility of exceptions.
Does Patrick Henry use inductive or deductive reasoning in his speech at the Virginia Convention?
Inductive- Specific to General.
What did Francis Bacon and English philosopher believe scientists should do?
use inductive reasoning.
What did Francis Bacon develope?
Francis Bacon was famous for developing inductive philosophy. This is what became the scientific method, which is still being used now.
What is an argument used by protesters to support their stance?
Economic costs are too high.
What are the 4 fundamentals of logic?
Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy
What makes an argument an argument?
An argument is inductive when it is based on probability, such as statistics. In an inductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
What makes an argument inductive?
An argument is considered inductive when the conclusion is based on a series of specific observations or evidence that may support the conclusion but does not guarantee it. Inductive arguments rely on the probability of the conclusion being true rather than its certainty.
How is inductive reasoning different from deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning varies from deductive reasoning as follows: 1) inductive reasoning is a reason supporting an argument and 2) deductive reasoning is an argument against an argument.
When is stong inductive argument uncogent?
A strong inductive argument can be considered uncogent if the premises are not relevant or if there is a problem with the reasoning or structure of the argument. Additionally, if the premises are not true or if there is a lack of sufficient evidence to support the conclusion, the strong inductive argument may be considered uncogent.
What is more common inductive argument or deductive argument?
Deductive arguments are more common than inductive arguments. Deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and applies it to a specific case, leading to a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations and generates a general hypothesis.
Is it possible to have a sound valid inductive argument?
Yes, it is possible to have a sound valid inductive argument. For an inductive argument to be sound, it must have a valid form (the conclusion must logically follow from the premises) and have true premises. This combination of validity and truth makes the argument sound.
What is The technical word for a good inductive argument?
strong
Can you substitute an analogy for other kinds of evidence to support points of an argument?
An analogy can be persuasive, or it can help people to understand your argument, but it isnt EVIDENCE.
How Can a strong inductive argument have a false conclusion?
Since an inductive argument is an argument where the truth of the premises make it reasonable to hold that the conclusion is true, it does not necessarily guarantee it, meaning you could have a false conclusion.
What is an argument that starts from a specific idea to a general conclusion?
Inductive.
How do you make an inductive argument stronger?
make the conclusion weaker
