by racing the mr2 vs the hatch.
1915, Pancho had trusted on the Americans for support to keep the presidency of Mexico, but instead the U.S government recognized the new government of Venustiano Carranza.
After successfully escaping from the power of a foreign government across the ocean in Britain many Americans were just as wary of a faraway central government even in their new country. They wanted each state to be independent of each other.
Pancho Villa hoped that his actions against Americans, particularly the raid on Columbus, New Mexico in 1916, would provoke a larger armed conflict between the United States and his rival, Mexican President Venustiano Carranza. Villa believed that this conflict would bring visibility to his cause and rally support for his revolutionary movement against Carranza. Additionally, he sought to demonstrate his power and force the United States to withdraw its support for Carranza's government.
The United States government supported this, in that they set up reservation for the Native Americans. They then bought the land from them and promised to protect them. The US government also wrote and signed many treaties to help the Native Americans. Sadly though this didnt last long. Because the settlers wanted the Native Americans land. This caused the Native Americans to fight back. They were fighting not only for their land, but for their resources. But mostly in order to keep their traditions. Thanks I hope that helps!
During the Great Depression, U.S. government actions, such as the implementation of the Social Security Act and other relief programs, often excluded agricultural and domestic workers, sectors where many Latinos were employed. Additionally, discriminatory practices in labor markets and government relief efforts led to widespread deportation and repatriation of Mexican Americans, exacerbating their economic struggles. This unique combination of exclusion from support systems and targeted deportation created hardships for Latinos that were distinct from those faced by other minority groups during the Depression.
Americans have historically responded to government actions through various means, including protests, advocacy, and public discourse. Responses can range from support and compliance to opposition and civil disobedience, reflecting a diverse political landscape. For instance, during movements like the Civil Rights Movement and anti-Vietnam War protests, many citizens mobilized to challenge government policies. Overall, the response often depends on the perceived legitimacy and impact of the government's actions on individual rights and societal issues.
thats a tough one
thats a tough one
impressment of American sailors and support for native Americans
Had to, US troops=US government.
The battle that won over the French government and made them decide to militarially and financially support the Americans was the American victory at Saratoga
1950 propaganda reflects the heightened fear and anxiety felt by Americans during the Cold War era. It often emphasized the dangers of communism and promoted patriotic ideals as a way to instill loyalty to the government. The propaganda aimed to rally public support for government policies and actions taken to combat the perceived threats from the Soviet Union.
They were most likely to support a form of Democracy. John Locke favored the idea of a representative government, that in which the people of the government would have a large say in the actions of the governments Leader(s).
he believed that the government had the power to tell native Americans where they could live
The U.S. government employed various strategies to garner public support for World War I, including propaganda campaigns that emphasized patriotism and the moral imperative of fighting for democracy. The Committee on Public Information (CPI) played a crucial role in disseminating pro-war messages through posters, film, and speeches. Additionally, the government encouraged enlistment and war bond purchases, portraying these actions as civic duties. By appealing to national pride and framing the war as a fight for freedom, the government successfully rallied public support.
No they did not. It hurt the government because the US was not getting the supplies they needed from the foreign contries.
it helps alot of the issues