Charlemagne generally employed a policy of integration and assimilation towards the people of conquered lands, promoting Christianity and the Latin culture. He established local governance and often appointed local leaders to maintain order and loyalty, while also imposing taxes and military obligations. While he sought to unify his empire, his methods could be harsh, including forced conversions and military campaigns against those who resisted his rule. Overall, Charlemagne aimed to create a cohesive realm while respecting some local customs to ensure stability.
Napoleon didn't really affect the people of the lands that he conquered in the sense that he didn't affect them personally. After he would conquer a nation, he would leave close friend or family member at set nation with his "code civil" to enforce his views upon the nation. this is called Nepotism. he or better yet his family members would treat them the same as if they resided in France; like the citizens that experienced a Revolution.
ffhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
At first, they treated them with fairness but much more crule as the empire went on.
He was a just king but his assistants made bad assessments in a few occasions. When he was convinced of their bad assessments, he threw them in the lions den. If you want good information on the topic, the best place is the Catholic version of the book of Daniel.
Xerxes I, the Persian king, is known for his often harsh treatment of conquered peoples. He implemented policies that involved heavy taxation, forced labor, and the imposition of Persian customs and administration. However, he sometimes allowed a degree of local autonomy and the continuation of local religions and traditions, aiming to integrate conquered territories into the vast Persian Empire. His approach varied depending on the region and the level of resistance encountered.
REALLY BAD!!!
Good
Rome treated conquered people generously. The knew the people would be more loyal to the government if treated like Romans.
He forced many people to move from their homes to faraway lands trying to end the rebellion against him.
Napoleon didn't really affect the people of the lands that he conquered in the sense that he didn't affect them personally. After he would conquer a nation, he would leave close friend or family member at set nation with his "code civil" to enforce his views upon the nation. this is called Nepotism. he or better yet his family members would treat them the same as if they resided in France; like the citizens that experienced a Revolution.
by licking penis
they had a tradition called the heistene where all the conquered people would get feces thrown in their face
how did jdye hehd
The Incas treated the people they conquered by having more emphasis on having those people become loyal Inca subjects.
It attempted to give them peace, prosperity and good government.
Bad, but if they are nice, they treat it nicely (but they won't).
ffhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh