Lord had to protect their serfs because the relationship between the lords and the serfs was one of mutual obligation. It was a sort of contract, under which each party got benefit, but each party had responsibilities.
The serfs gave the lords labor. They also had given up their rights to move away from the manors and were bound to the soil, as they say. This was a two-way thing, however; the serfs did not have a right to move away from the manor, but the lords did not have the right to make them move away from the manor.
They lords gave the serfs fields to farm, a place to live, and protection. The protection they provided was from armies, raiders, and criminals, but it also extended to other things, and might, in theory, include provision of food if there was a famine.
Yes, the merchants had power over the peasants and the serfs
Well lords had power over nights and nights had power over peasants. The lords and nights lived in manners. lords would tax nights and nights would tax peasants peasants would pay in money and crops. In the medieval times there was a system called The Feudal System the monarch (king) was at the top then the bishops and lords next was the nights and lower clergy and then at the bottom the peasants.
A Lord was a "Landlord" and he had power over his manor/estates, but owed his power to the king. The king had the ultimate power.
Michael Romanov, elected czar of Russia in 1613, granted absolute control over peasants to landowners through the implementation of serfdom. This system effectively tied peasants to the land they worked on, allowing landowners to exert significant authority over their lives and labor. This move was part of a broader effort to stabilize and strengthen the Russian state following the Time of Troubles.
lords would rule over a manor (a small village/town that contained homes for peasants, shops, and usually a church.) they would tax the peasants that they ruled over. The lords had vassals, and in exchange for loyalty, the lord would grant his vassal a fief (land)
the had a lot of power over the peasants.
If they have slaves or peasants they have power over them.
Under Tenants had power over the peasants
Yes, the merchants had power over the peasants and the serfs
Historically, a Knight held authority over serfs and peasants in exchange for protection and service to their Lord. Knights were considered elite warriors and could exert influence over those of lower social status. However, the extent of their power varied depending on the specific feudal system and the Knight's individual status.
Hitler
Peasants received land to cultivate, protection, and the right to live on the estate from the feudal lord. In return, they provided labor, a portion of their crops, and various dues or services to the lord. This mutual dependence created a hierarchical structure where the lord maintained control over the land and the peasant population, while the peasants relied on the lord for their livelihood and security.
Well lords had power over nights and nights had power over peasants. The lords and nights lived in manners. lords would tax nights and nights would tax peasants peasants would pay in money and crops. In the medieval times there was a system called The Feudal System the monarch (king) was at the top then the bishops and lords next was the nights and lower clergy and then at the bottom the peasants.
The power to impeach judges
A Lord was a "Landlord" and he had power over his manor/estates, but owed his power to the king. The king had the ultimate power.
The president has More power over all of them, or whatever. lol.
The king