The North declared secession to be treasonous. The South maintained that the USA was a voluntary association of states, and that any state could leave the Union if it chose.
On the morality of slavery, the Northern abolitionists (a minority, but an increasingly powerful one) declared that slavery was ungodly. The South argued that it was a perfect God-given arrangement of man and master.
As the argument heated-up in the 1850's, church ministers on both sides were put under pressure to preach the relevant beliefs.
In 1861, the legality of secession was a contentious issue. Some argued that states had the right to secede from the Union, while others believed that the Constitution did not allow for secession. Ultimately, the Civil War settled the question, with the Union victory establishing that secession was not constitutional.
The question is stated incorrectly. William Jenning Bryan actually PROSECUTED Scopes on behalf of the State of Tennessee which at the time, had a law against the teaching of evolution. Scopes teaching of evolution was DEFENDED by Clarence Darrow. See below link:
When you cannot find any other sources that supports its arguments.
The answer to this question is this.... They opposed having such a strong central government and thus were against the Constitution.
"Beliefs" only requires faith. Facts requires proof. Technically, your question is correct because you used the word "BELIEF".
Incorporate the opposing arguments into your research to provide a more comprehensive analysis. Address the opposing arguments with counterarguments backed by evidence to strengthen your research. Acknowledge the validity of the opposing arguments while highlighting the strengths of your own research.
In 1861, the legality of secession was a contentious issue. Some argued that states had the right to secede from the Union, while others believed that the Constitution did not allow for secession. Ultimately, the Civil War settled the question, with the Union victory establishing that secession was not constitutional.
if i have interpreted your question correctly then the answer is simple: they defended the FORT
When doing research on compelling arguments for both sides of a research question, you should search for and take notes on the arguments for both sides.
Historical arguments are formed to answer historical questions. Answer this question…
The preamble
Lee and Lincoln both felt that secession would damage the country, and allthough there were many contrasting points of view in the nation at the time, they felt that it would be a bad idea to permit any secession.
Present both arguments and explain what you view is.
a question that can be answered in a sinqle sentence.Both arguments APEX
Answer this question… To show the author's attitude toward a subject
The IF function has 3 arguments. They are the condition, the action to take if the condition is true and the action to take if the condition is false. See the related question below.
Why did woman and enslaved Africans question their position in war? Some enslaved Africans were women. Which war? What position are you referring to? The question is pretty vague.