Well
Peasants commonly wore clothes made of hemp, wool, and ferret skins and many fell into debt and were forced to work as farming tenants for wealthy landlords. Each successive rank gave its holder greater pensions and legal privileges. Do u people like it... this was my ss h/w question, i'm in class 603 :) :) :) :) <3 <3~The classes only divided people into social rank. They did not indicate wealth or power. For instance, even though peasants made up the second highest class, they were poor. Many merchants, on the other hand, were wealthy and powerful despite being in the lowest class~ From Joseph B Cavalloro Student c: I'm in 608
They were called the "kulaks"
The negative way is ....the dynasty is a family of wealthy people and the people always ...
because their wealthy
Peasants in ancient China often revolted due to heavy taxation, forced labor, and land exploitation by wealthy landlords and the government. Economic hardships, including famine and natural disasters, exacerbated their suffering, leading to widespread discontent. Social inequality and lack of political power further fueled their desire for change, culminating in uprisings such as the Yellow Turban Rebellion during the late Han Dynasty. These revolts were often driven by a quest for better living conditions and a fairer society.
China under the Han dynasty and the Roman Empire were similar in that both grew wealthy because they Developed extensive trade networks.
They were called the "kulaks"
Kulaks.
a large Spanish colonial estate owned by a wealthy family but worked by many peasants called an hacienda
Peasants does farm-work for the wealthy land owners.
The negative way is ....the dynasty is a family of wealthy people and the people always ...
The peasants/common people were in the Third Estate. The wealthy merchant class was also in the Third Estate. The Second Estate were the nobility. The First Estate was the church/clergy.
Most medieval peasants were poor. In fact, most were serfs, who could not own land and were not allowed to move away from the manors on which they lived. A few peasants were independent farmers who held their own land, and some of these were referred to by contemporary writers as wealthy. They were, of course only wealthy relative to other peasants, and had very little wealth compared to the lords.
Oil
because their wealthy
Zhou justified Shang Dynasty because Zhou had wanted to be very wealthy and such
WellPeasants commonly wore clothes made of hemp, wool, and ferret skins and many fell into debt and were forced to work as farming tenants for wealthy landlords. Each successive rank gave its holder greater pensions and legal privileges. Do u people like it... this was my ss h/w question, i'm in class 603 :) :) :) :)
China under the Han dynasty and the Roman Empire were similar in that both grew wealthy because they Developed extensive trade networks.