They did not want to give up there slaves.( I don't know much, but I'm an 8th grader, so..)
Democrats in Iowa were shocked by the Emancipation Proclamation. They were also encouraged by their party's success at the polls in the 1862 elections. They were holding numerous peace meetings throughout the state in January of 1863. The Republican Governor, Samuel Kirkwood. He asked Washington DC for the authority to raise several regiments to intimidate Democrats that were organizing for peace.
In the south, white reacted to the proclamation with rage.
No, the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all the enslaved persons. Only the slaves in the "rebellious states" were freed by the Emancipation Proclamation. The "rebellious states" were those which had seceded from the Union, except for the states that had already come under Northern control.
Abraham Lincoln received support for the Emancipation Proclamation primarily from abolitionists, many members of the Republican Party, and some northern Democrats who believed in the moral imperative of ending slavery. However, he faced significant opposition from Southern states, which viewed the proclamation as an attack on their way of life, as well as some conservative Democrats and border state leaders who were concerned about the implications for their own slaveholding practices. Additionally, some military leaders were initially skeptical about its impact on the war effort.
because the north was against slavery so he waited till they won to anounce to the south the emancipation proclamation
Relief that Britain and France would not be able to send military aid to the Confederates.
Relief that Britain and France would not be able to send military aid to the Confederates.
Democrats in Iowa were shocked by the Emancipation Proclamation. They were also encouraged by their party's success at the polls in the 1862 elections. They were holding numerous peace meetings throughout the state in January of 1863. The Republican Governor, Samuel Kirkwood. He asked Washington DC for the authority to raise several regiments to intimidate Democrats that were organizing for peace.
In the south, white reacted to the proclamation with rage.
Antietam
idk but i know a website you can go to here it is: www.History.com your welcome yours truly TLC <3 :0
The Emancipation Proclamation did not enfranchise the slaves in the northern territories.
No, the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all the enslaved persons. Only the slaves in the "rebellious states" were freed by the Emancipation Proclamation. The "rebellious states" were those which had seceded from the Union, except for the states that had already come under Northern control.
Abraham Lincoln received support for the Emancipation Proclamation primarily from abolitionists, many members of the Republican Party, and some northern Democrats who believed in the moral imperative of ending slavery. However, he faced significant opposition from Southern states, which viewed the proclamation as an attack on their way of life, as well as some conservative Democrats and border state leaders who were concerned about the implications for their own slaveholding practices. Additionally, some military leaders were initially skeptical about its impact on the war effort.
He wrote the Emancipation Proclamation, which ended all slavery. The Emancipation Proclamation only ended slavery in the states that were part of the Confederacy, not in the border states that fought with the northern states in the civil war.
because the north was against slavery so he waited till they won to anounce to the south the emancipation proclamation
When Lincoln announced the emancipation proclamation, some of the slaves were free which then aided the union army to end the war.