idk do u no?
China's economy is known as a command system, or a socialist economy. This means that the wealth of everyone in China's work force is evenly distributed amongst everyone in the country. This poses a problem for people's incentive to work which is the main flaw in this type of economy
Wealth in a communist country is divided among its people according to their needs. In the 1875 work titled "A Critique of the Gotha Programme," Karl Marx described this as "From each according to his ability. To each according to his need." Most people erroneously believe that wealth in a communist society is distributed evenly to everyone. This is not so. NOTE: WILL SOMEONE PLEASE RE-CATEGORIZE THIS PROPERLY. IT SHOULD GO INTO "COMMUNISM", "KARL MARX" , AND MAYBE EVEN "LENIN" SINCE HE ADVOCATED THE COROLLARY "HE WHO DOES NOT WORK, SHALL NOT EAT." IT CERTAINLY DOES NOT BELONG IN "COLD WAR", OR "JOSEPH STALIN." ISN"T THERE A COMPETENT SUPERVISOR WATCHING THE "JOSEPH STALIN" CATEGORY."
I believe it is George Guidall.
The two factors that contributed to Egypt's wealth during the New Kingdom were conquest and trade.I believe two factores contributed to Egypts wealth during the New Kingdom were the conquest and trading.
The speech "Every Man a King" was delivered by Huey Long, the Louisiana politician, in the 1930s to promote his populist agenda. It aimed to advocate for economic equality and social justice, emphasizing the idea that wealth should be more evenly distributed among the population. Long sought to rally support for his proposed programs, including wealth redistribution and public works, to combat the hardships of the Great Depression. Ultimately, the speech was a call to empower ordinary citizens and challenge the established elite.
Uneven prosperity often refers to a society where wealth is not evenly distributed.
wider The world is getting wealthier, but the new wealth is not distributed evenly.
Communism is, in theory, a form of government in which wealth is distributed evenly. In practice, corruption is rampant, and the government becomes authoritarian.
Do you mean American colonial society? if you do, then no, of course not, there were rich and poor as there was everywhere.
Global wealth is less evenly distributed. Due to globalization The wealth gap is growing larger Outsourcing is becoming more common
Not everyone can be rich because wealth is relative and limited. In a society where everyone is rich, the value of wealth would decrease, making it no longer a distinguishing factor. Additionally, resources and opportunities are not evenly distributed, leading to disparities in wealth accumulation.
Sinclair believed that the nation's entire economic system needed to be reformed along Socialist lines. La Follette believed that wealth needed to be evenly distributed...also socialism
A person who believes that wealth should be evenly distributed throughout society is often referred to as a socialist. Socialists advocate for policies that promote economic equality, such as progressive taxation, social welfare programs, and public ownership of resources. They argue that reducing wealth disparities can lead to a more just and equitable society, where everyone has access to essential services and opportunities. Prominent figures like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have expressed similar views on wealth distribution in their political platforms.
No, the Industrial Revolution was actual the beginning of an uneven distribution of wealth. Most of the money stayed in the hands of the very rich.
Like most countries, wealth is not distributed evenly. There have been a lot of social and political problems in Venezuela, including corruption, but that has improved.
No, natural resources are not distributed evenly around the world. Different regions have different levels of abundance in resources such as oil, minerals, and water. Factors like geology, climate, and past geological processes influence the distribution of natural resources across the globe.
Economics.