Shays' Rebellion convinced people that under the Articles of Confederation, the national government was too weak to enforce laws. The rebellion was led by Daniel Shays.
Shays' Rebellion frightened many Americans because it was just that, an armed rebellion against a fledgling Federal Government. The rebellion, which directly challenged the authority of a Federal Government that was still predominantly weak (see "Articles of Confederation"), demanded rapid action from the President, at the time George Washington. Washington lead several thousand troops directly into the area, silencing any idea of rebellion and maintaining the legitimacy of the government, as well as demonstrating to Americans that rebellion against "The Peoples's Government" was not acceptable. In short though, Americans were watching the government deploying soldiers domestically to quell rebellion purported by other Americans. This was frightening, watching a rebellion being put down within our own nation. In the end, Washington pardoned the leaders of the rebellion, and everything ultimately turned out okay.
Shays' Rebellion in 1786-1787 showed different things to different observers at the time -- and even now. At that time, an observer the likes of Thomas Jefferson was unaffected: he seemed to think that it represented an appropriate kind independence-mindedness among free peoples. For others, it demonstrated the need for making stronger powers available to the federal government, which is precisely what was enacted through the Constitution of the United States in the same period.
women. that's all i can think of..
The three main factors that led the colonies to consider confederation were the need for a unified defense against external threats, particularly from Britain and Indigenous peoples; the challenges of managing trade and economic stability among the separate colonies; and the desire for a more effective governance structure to address internal disputes and coordinate responses to issues. These factors highlighted the limitations of the Articles of Confederation, prompting calls for a stronger, centralized government that could better serve the interests of all colonies.
France got invaded by the rebellions and peoples died and stuff xD :p
Articles of Confederation: could not enforce laws, could not form army, no Bill of Rights, etc
the outcome of shay's rebellion was it demonstarted the authority of any Government when it acted against the peoples wishes
It was called that because the Article of confederation government was very friendly and took peoples problems and answers into consideration. source: I am a 7th grade Social Studies teacher!
Shays' Rebellion frightened many Americans because it was just that, an armed rebellion against a fledgling Federal Government. The rebellion, which directly challenged the authority of a Federal Government that was still predominantly weak (see "Articles of Confederation"), demanded rapid action from the President, at the time George Washington. Washington lead several thousand troops directly into the area, silencing any idea of rebellion and maintaining the legitimacy of the government, as well as demonstrating to Americans that rebellion against "The Peoples's Government" was not acceptable. In short though, Americans were watching the government deploying soldiers domestically to quell rebellion purported by other Americans. This was frightening, watching a rebellion being put down within our own nation. In the end, Washington pardoned the leaders of the rebellion, and everything ultimately turned out okay.
yes they matter because peoplematter and so do there opinions
Shays' Rebellion in 1786-1787 showed different things to different observers at the time -- and even now. At that time, an observer the likes of Thomas Jefferson was unaffected: he seemed to think that it represented an appropriate kind independence-mindedness among free peoples. For others, it demonstrated the need for making stronger powers available to the federal government, which is precisely what was enacted through the Constitution of the United States in the same period.
It depends on peoples opinions .
It's peoples opinions
Depends on peoples opinions.
Worldviews are peoples opinion. They AFFECT peoples lives if those people belive and live by those opinions.
Well, it benfited the aboriginal peoples because then they did it.
that would be certain peoples opinions. :)