The French supplied it to the "americans"
the british army of the American revolution was well trained, led and equipped. however, the troops did not fare well so far from England and home. The American army had little in the way of training , equipment and supplies. but, they did have the will to fight the british oppression of the Americas. Washingtons acquiring of General Von Stueben made a big balls change in the training of American troops. the vanquish of british troops helpped the American army with guns and supplies which were in short supply. so, in some way the british helped supply the American forces.......... and that's all. oh yeah
The French saved the colonies from British rule.
Colonies were concerned about a standing army because they viewed it as a potential tool of oppression that could be used by the British government to enforce its will and quash dissent. Many colonists believed that a professional army could undermine local militias and the rights of self-governance, fostering fear of military tyranny. Additionally, the presence of British troops was seen as an imposition on their liberties, particularly given the costs associated with supporting them, which often fell to the colonies.
poland.
The first troops sent to help the colonists in their fight against the British were the Continental Army, established in 1775. Under the command of General George Washington, these troops engaged British forces in key battles such as the Siege of Boston and the Battle of Bunker Hill. Their involvement marked a significant escalation in the conflict, as they united the colonies in their struggle for independence from British rule.
The 13 colonies all worked together to defeat the British troops, the most powerful army at the time.
Great Britain usually had to supply their troops with military equipment by sea from Britain. Many of the sources in the colonies were being used by the Continental Army and those that were available to the British decreased in number as the war went on.
The Continental Army was not composed of soldiers as well-trained or prepared as the British troops.
the british army of the American revolution was well trained, led and equipped. however, the troops did not fare well so far from England and home. The American army had little in the way of training , equipment and supplies. but, they did have the will to fight the british oppression of the Americas. Washingtons acquiring of General Von Stueben made a big balls change in the training of American troops. the vanquish of british troops helpped the American army with guns and supplies which were in short supply. so, in some way the british helped supply the American forces.......... and that's all. oh yeah
The French saved the colonies from British rule.
In 1777, the British' attempt to cut New England off from the rest of the colonies failed when Burgoyne surrendered his army at Saratoga.
the british army belonged to england, the continental army was from the 13 colonies - fan of Jamie Lynn Spears
the british army belonged to england, the continental army was from the 13 colonies - fan of Jamie Lynn Spears
British troops of the Boston garrison against troops of the American Continental Army.
British troops of the Boston garrison against troops of the American Continental Army.
The British Army currently has troops deployed in Afghanistan under the name Operation Herrick. Troops are also deployed in Africa, Canada and Cyprus.
Colonies were concerned about a standing army because they viewed it as a potential tool of oppression that could be used by the British government to enforce its will and quash dissent. Many colonists believed that a professional army could undermine local militias and the rights of self-governance, fostering fear of military tyranny. Additionally, the presence of British troops was seen as an imposition on their liberties, particularly given the costs associated with supporting them, which often fell to the colonies.