For all practical purposes the Europeans early in WW 2 were shaken by Hitler's Blitzkrieg. Later when the US entered the war, the new western allies were able to push back German forces completely out of France. In WW 1 this was never possible.The Soviets, unlike Russia in WW1 were able to counter attack the German invasion in Russia. The combined WW 2 allied success in WW 2 was totally different than in WW 1.
World War 1 was fought mainly with trench warfare but in World War 2 bombs, tanks, and chemical warfare changed the game.
The Tuscarora Indians and the Germans, Dutch and British were fighting in the war. The Europeans won even though many tribes joined the Tuscaroras.
They were fighting for there freedom and ours
Not really, the majority of the fighting took place in France, and with this war being more of a global war, all fighting can be attributed to the First World War.
The war in Vietnam, the Korean War, World War 1, World War 2...were fought against Nations (countries). The United States is NOT at war with Iraq nor Afghanistan. The US is at war with insurgents/terrorists (criminals that attacked New York City on 9/11); they just happen to be in the Iraq/Afghanistan regions.
The italians
neither will be fighting in the war
World War 1 Compared to world war 2 was a war with very obsolete weapons, machinery, and equipment. world war 2 composed the best weapons, aircraft, tanks, artillery, and equipment of both wars.
The Tuscarora Indians and the Germans, Dutch and British were fighting in the war. The Europeans won even though many tribes joined the Tuscaroras.
well, in world war you, most Europeans resented the nations who started to attack me. Thus, the Europeans invaded the others and defended me. You call it "world war you", however, it concerned me, so I call it "world war me"
The wars are not comparable. All had different causes, and were fought under different conditions. However, the Confederates liked to compare themselves with the heroes of the American Revolution, fighting for self-government. And the fighting at Petersburg in 1864-5 did resemble the trench warfare of World War 1.
the australian aboriginals didn't have good weapons to defeat the europeans, the australian aboriginals only have boomerangs and aeros for weapons, and the european have guns. so the europeans won the war.
For all practical purposes the Europeans early in WW 2 were shaken by Hitler's Blitzkrieg. Later when the US entered the war, the new western allies were able to push back German forces completely out of France. In WW 1 this was never possible.The Soviets, unlike Russia in WW1 were able to counter attack the German invasion in Russia. The combined WW 2 allied success in WW 2 was totally different than in WW 1.
the people fighting in world war II got around mainly by aircrafts the people fighting in world war II got around mainly by aircrafts
Most of the fighting from world war 1 happened in Europe in the countries of Belgium and France. The germans did most of the fighting and invasions.
the Europeans
yo dudes
fighting and violence