The Framers of the Constitution employed compromise to address the diverse interests and concerns of various states and groups. The Great Compromise combined the Virginia Plan's emphasis on representation based on population with the New Jersey Plan's call for equal representation for all states in the Senate. Additionally, the Three-Fifths Compromise addressed disputes over slavery by counting enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for representation purposes. These compromises were essential in creating a balanced framework that could garner broad support and facilitate the ratification of the Constitution.
There is a house for both the small states and the big ones.
The first ten amendments to the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights, describes the power and rights of American citizens. These amendments, ratified in 1791, reflect the belief of the framers of the Constitution in the principle of limited government. The Amendments place strict limits on how the national government can use its power over the people.
Yes, one of the key issues involving slavery in the Constitution was the Three-Fifths Compromise, which determined that enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of representation and taxation. Additionally, the Constitution included a provision that allowed the continuation of the transatlantic slave trade for twenty years after its ratification, after which Congress could prohibit it. These compromises reflect the contentious nature of slavery in the early United States and the political negotiations surrounding its existence.
Both reflect ideas of Enlightenment thinkers. :)
There are several features of the Constitution that indicate distrust of popular government. These include the election of the president by the Electoral College, the fact that judges are appointed for life, and the selection of senators by state legislatures. Voting requirements were left to the states, which imposed property requirements. These requirements reflect a distrust popular government, because citizens could vote directly only for members of the House of Representatives-the lower house, which has a two-year term of office. In addition, property requirements prevented many citizens from voting at all. One must also know that the framers evaded the issue of voting altogether, giving this right to the states. Also, the framers distrusted the common people because the masses were uninformed, easily swayed, and lacked long term thinking. It was felt that participation by the common people would result in a true democracy being unstable, would shift positions frequently, and would suffer from the lack of long-term thinking.
* * * * * *
The Founders established a Constitutional Republic.
Nothing in the constitution shows a distrust of democracy. In fact, the very foundation of the constitution is based on the philosophy of democracy. The men who wrote it didn't trust that people could vote and make correct decisions about the government.
The U.S. Constitution was designed to be a living document, with the framers including an amendment process to allow for changes as society evolved. While the original text set a foundation, the framers anticipated that future generations would need to adapt the Constitution to address new challenges and ideas. Therefore, while it was not intended to remain static, the amendment process was intentionally made rigorous to ensure that changes would reflect considerable consensus.
The Constitution had to change with them. In order to be a working document, it had to be changed to reflect what was going on -- they knew, for instance, that slavery was someday going to be abolished, but they knew it was going to be for several generations.
Because the US government was set up to be run by the people through representatives, rather than as a dictatorship, so they wanted the wording of the constitution to reflect that.
The government only has the powers given to it by the Constitution.
how is republicanism reflected in both the u.s. and the texas constitution?
They knew that people were going to change, and that the Constitution had to change with them. In order to be a working document, it had to be changed to reflect what was going on -- they knew, for instance, that slavery was someday going to be abolished, but they knew it was going to be for several generations. However, they wanted the amendment process to be difficult, so that the Constitution wasn't changed by people's fleeting whims. In other words, they made the process difficult so that 'popular passions' wouldn't alter the Constitution.
It didnt
The U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1787, was a result of multiple compromises during the Constitutional Convention, addressing the need for a stronger federal government following the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. Key compromises included the Great Compromise, which established a bicameral legislature, and the Three-Fifths Compromise, which determined how slaves would be counted for representation and taxation. These negotiations reflect the diverse interests and regional differences among the states at the time. Ultimately, the Constitution aimed to create a balance between federal authority and state sovereignty.
There are several features of the Constitution that indicate distrust of popular government. These include the election of the president by the Electoral College, the fact that judges are appointed for life, and the selection of senators by state legislatures. Voting requirements were left to the states, which imposed property requirements. These requirements reflect a distrust popular government, because citizens could vote directly only for members of the House of Representatives, the lower house, which has a two-year term of office. In addition, property requirements prevented many citizens from voting at all. One must also know that the framers evaded the issue of voting altogether, giving this right to the states