North dislike The Fugitive Slave Law, because that did not support slavery, and therefore did not want to send escaped slaves back to the south. North brought the slavery issue to their own doorstep , and gave the runawys a heroic victim status.
The Fugitive Slave Act was so significant in the North's trend towards abolitionism because it gave people personal reasons to despise the South's slave system. As part of the Compromise of 1850 (I believe), the only real concession that the South received was the Fugitive Slave Act, which was a federal mandate that allowed southern slave catchers to go into the free North to recapture runaway slaves. Northerners were outraged by this, because not only did they feel that their privacy was being violated, but sometimes free blacks were taken off the streets and whisked away into southern slavery. In retaliation, Northern states retaliated with personal resistance, and even state laws, in order to make the slave catchers' job as difficult as possible (the ironic part about the state laws was that they essentially "nullified" federal law, which the South was notorious for). The North's public backlash against the Fugitive Slave Act led many to evolve abolitionist sentiments, and abolitionists transitioned from being a radical outside voice to becoming a dominant idea of Northern thinking.
how did former slave owners feel about Jim crow laws
The Fugitive Slave Act forced those who lived in northern states or any who supported abolition, to send runaway slaves back to their owners in an effort to maintain peace between the north and south. So the view of the southerners was that the act MUST be enforced and their slaves returned to them.
The north had some supporters of the compromise while other northerners opposed it. While the northern democrats accepted the compromise, the northern Whigs thought it to be unfair to northern territories. They especially believed that this compromise would create a problem with fugitive slaves having to force slave owning farmers to waste productive agricultural time hunting down slaves.
The North was generally opposed to Missouri's request to join the Union as a slave state because it would disrupt the delicate balance between free and slave states. The admission of Missouri could lead to the expansion of slavery into new territories, which many in the North opposed. This tension culminated in the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which allowed Missouri to enter as a slave state but simultaneously admitted Maine as a free state to maintain the balance. Overall, the North viewed Missouri's request through the lens of the growing sectional conflict over slavery.
The Fugitive Slave Act was so significant in the North's trend towards abolitionism because it gave people personal reasons to despise the South's slave system. As part of the Compromise of 1850 (I believe), the only real concession that the South received was the Fugitive Slave Act, which was a federal mandate that allowed southern slave catchers to go into the free North to recapture runaway slaves. Northerners were outraged by this, because not only did they feel that their privacy was being violated, but sometimes free blacks were taken off the streets and whisked away into southern slavery. In retaliation, Northern states retaliated with personal resistance, and even state laws, in order to make the slave catchers' job as difficult as possible (the ironic part about the state laws was that they essentially "nullified" federal law, which the South was notorious for). The North's public backlash against the Fugitive Slave Act led many to evolve abolitionist sentiments, and abolitionists transitioned from being a radical outside voice to becoming a dominant idea of Northern thinking.
how did former slave owners feel about Jim crow laws
The federal government did not enforce the Fugitive Slave Law of 1793
goood
many Americans were outraged at this, mostly because of the fugitive slave act that had become a part of US law. by forcing the north to help capture the slaves, it made them feel as if they were part of the slave system. tensions remained high because neither of the sides got all that they wanted in the agreement. each time the act was enforced, it convinced the north that slavery was immoral and evil.
It had no effect on slaves. It brought in the Fugitive Slave Act, which had some effect on free(d) blacks, who came under suspicion if they looked as though they might be runaway slaves. The public was under pressure to report people of this sort, under threat of severe fines. I was also answering it! The Compromise of 1850 did not have any impact on slaves. They remained slaves. The problem came with the Fugitive Slave Law. Thugs would kidnap Free Black People and sell them as slaves. In the story Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, the river pirates turn on Jim, the runaway slave, and sell him to the Sheriff under the Fugitive Slave Law. Huck then claimed that Jim was his slave. The Sheriff did not care. He could sell Jim for more money. Thus, the problem did not apply to slaves living with their owners but with free or runaway blacks.
The fugitive slave law gave southerners some protection against being bankrupted by thousands of escaping slaves. The law gave northern banks greater willingness to support slavery by loaning money to slave owners. The law also had the effect of co-opting the support of northern newspapers, which carried the very profitable ads for return of escaped slaves. Basically, the fugitive slave act gave national endorsement to the whole system of slavery.
Not much. It was fairly ineffectual. That was why they introduced the much-tougher Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, to make the South feel that Congress was doing something positive for them, in exchange for allowing the first coast-to-coast railroad to pass through Chicago instead of going the New Mexico route.
They agreed to the Compromise of 1850 - though they weren't too happy about California joining the Union as free soil. That was why Congress had to appease them by enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act - which managed to mobilise a lot of Northern sympathy with the runaways.
He was against the slave trade.
the just loved it
The Fugitive Slave Act forced those who lived in northern states or any who supported abolition, to send runaway slaves back to their owners in an effort to maintain peace between the north and south. So the view of the southerners was that the act MUST be enforced and their slaves returned to them.