answersLogoWhite

0

nope thats why im looking

User Avatar

Haylie Prohaska

Lvl 10
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

How did the Romans respond to the teachings of Jesus?

AnswerAccording to most scholars, the Romans largely ignored the Christian religion. Even as Christianity began to attract a modest number of adherents in the eastern Empire, the western Empire remained largely immune to the new religion. Those Romans who were aware of the teachings of Jesus admired the moral principles behind them, just as they admired Judaism. And gradually over the centuries, some began to accept Christianity.


What did the Romans call the Netherlands?

The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.


Did the poor Romans have butter?

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.


Did the Romans had televisions?

Ancient Romans. No


How did Latin become the dominant language in Rome?

Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.

Related Questions

How did the Romans respond to Jewish rebellions?

They crushed it, killing huge numbers of Jews.


How did the Romans respond to the teachings of Jesus?

AnswerAccording to most scholars, the Romans largely ignored the Christian religion. Even as Christianity began to attract a modest number of adherents in the eastern Empire, the western Empire remained largely immune to the new religion. Those Romans who were aware of the teachings of Jesus admired the moral principles behind them, just as they admired Judaism. And gradually over the centuries, some began to accept Christianity.


Is it respond to or respond for?

It can be either one, depending on your meaning. You would "respond to" a question or comment directed at you. You would "respond for" someone else who cannot respond for themselves.


What did the Romans call London?

The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".


What did the Romans call the Netherlands?

The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.


How long did Romans have kings?

The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.


Did the poor Romans have butter?

No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.


who at first considered a threat but later embraced it?

the Romans


Did the Romans come from Greece?

No, the Romans, as we know them, came from Italy.No, the Romans, as we know them, came from Italy.No, the Romans, as we know them, came from Italy.No, the Romans, as we know them, came from Italy.No, the Romans, as we know them, came from Italy.No, the Romans, as we know them, came from Italy.No, the Romans, as we know them, came from Italy.No, the Romans, as we know them, came from Italy.No, the Romans, as we know them, came from Italy.


Who were the roman slaves called?

The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.


Why did the Romans speak Latin?

Latin was the language of the Romans. The Romans were Latins


How did the Romans respond when they saw the way the British soldiers fought?

It is more of a case of how the Romans treated the Britons as it was the Romans who conquered Britain.The Celts in England were integrated into the empire and most likely became Romanised. Those in Wales resisted the Roman advance for a long time and then became integrated. The Picts, the Celts of Scotland continually fought the Romans, who gave up the conquest of Scotland. They also raided northern England. Present day Britons did not exist in the Roman days. They are the descendants of the Angle and the Saxons who migrated to Britain in the 4th and 5th century and took over from the Romans. During this process they raided Roman towns